paper-with-me

Papers

SeedBERT: Recovering Annotator Rating Distributions from an Aggregated Label

2022-11-23 · Aneesha Sampath, Victoria Lin, Louis-Philippe Morency

Many machine learning tasks -- particularly those in affective computing -- are inherently subjective. When asked to classify facial expressions or to rate an individual's attractiveness, humans may disagree with one another, and no single answer may be objectively correct. However, machine learning datasets commonly have just one "ground truth" label for each sample, so models trained on these labels may not perform well on tasks that are subjective in nature. Though allowing models to learn from the individual annotators' ratings may help, most datasets do not provide annotator-specific labels for each sample. To address this issue, we propose SeedBERT, a method for recovering annotator rating distributions from a single label by inducing pre-trained models to attend to different portions of the input. Our human evaluations indicate that SeedBERT's attention mechanism is consistent with human sources of annotator disagreement. Moreover, in our empirical evaluations using large language models, SeedBERT demonstrates substantial gains in performance on downstream subjective tasks compared both to standard deep learning models and to other current models that account explicitly for annotator disagreement.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2211.13196

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

NUTMEG: Separating Signal From Noise in Annotator Disagreement

2025-07-25 · Jonathan Ivey, Susan Gauch, David Jurgens arxiv

NLP models often rely on human-labeled data for training and evaluation. Many approaches crowdsource this data from a large number of annotators with varying skills, backgrounds, and motivations, resulting in conflicting…

Confidence Calibration under Ambiguous Ground Truth

2026-03-24 · Linwei Tao, Haoyang Luo, Minjing Dong, Chang Xu arxiv

Confidence calibration assumes a unique ground-truth label per input, yet this assumption fails wherever annotators genuinely disagree. Post-hoc calibrators fitted on majority-voted labels, the standard single-label targ…

Fine-Grained Perspectives: Modeling Explanations with Annotator-Specific Rationales

2026-04-23 · Olufunke O. Sarumi, Charles Welch, Daniel Braun arxiv

Beyond exploring disaggregated labels for modeling perspectives, annotator rationales provide fine-grained signals of individual perspectives. In this work, we propose a framework for jointly modeling annotator-specific …

Natural Language InferenceExplanation Generation

GRATE: Granular Recovery of Aggregated Tensor Data by Example

2020-03-27 · Ahmed S. Zamzam, Bo Yang, Nicholas D. Sidiropoulos

In this paper, we address the challenge of recovering an accurate breakdown of aggregated tensor data using disaggregation examples. This problem is motivated by several applications. For example, given the breakdown of …

AnnoBERT: Effectively Representing Multiple Annotators' Label Choices to Improve Hate Speech Detection

2022-12-20 · Wenjie Yin, Vibhor Agarwal, Aiqi Jiang, Arkaitz Zubiaga 외

Supervised approaches generally rely on majority-based labels. However, it is hard to achieve high agreement among annotators in subjective tasks such as hate speech detection. Existing neural network models principally …

Hate Speech Detection