Seeing Through AI's Lens: Enhancing Human Skepticism Towards LLM-Generated Fake News
LLMs offer valuable capabilities, yet they can be utilized by malicious users to disseminate deceptive information and generate fake news. The growing prevalence of LLMs poses difficulties in crafting detection approaches that remain effective across various text domains. Additionally, the absence of precautionary measures for AI-generated news on online social platforms is concerning. Therefore, there is an urgent need to improve people's ability to differentiate between news articles written by humans and those produced by LLMs. By providing cues in human-written and LLM-generated news, we can help individuals increase their skepticism towards fake LLM-generated news. This paper aims to elucidate simple markers that help individuals distinguish between articles penned by humans and those created by LLMs. To achieve this, we initially collected a dataset comprising 39k news articles authored by humans or generated by four distinct LLMs with varying degrees of fake. We then devise a metric named Entropy-Shift Authorship Signature (ESAS) based on the information theory and entropy principles. The proposed ESAS ranks terms or entities, like POS tagging, within news articles based on their relevance in discerning article authorship. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our metric by showing the high accuracy attained by a basic method, i.e., TF-IDF combined with logistic regression classifier, using a small set of terms with the highest ESAS score. Consequently, we introduce and scrutinize these top ESAS-ranked terms to aid individuals in strengthening their skepticism towards LLM-generated fake news.
Code (1)
Tasks
ArticlesPOSPOS TaggingMethods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Exploring Societal Concerns and Perceptions of AI: A Thematic Analysis through the Lens of Problem-Seeking
This study introduces a novel conceptual framework distinguishing problem-seeking from problem-solving to clarify the unique features of human intelligence in contrast to AI. Problem-seeking refers to the embodied, emoti…
MisinformationAI Risk Skepticism
In this work, we survey skepticism regarding AI risk and show parallels with other types of scientific skepticism. We start by classifying different types of AI Risk skepticism and analyze their root causes. We conclude …
SurveyAI Risk Skepticism, A Comprehensive Survey
In this thorough study, we took a closer look at the skepticism that has arisen with respect to potential dangers associated with artificial intelligence, denoted as AI Risk Skepticism. Our study takes into account diffe…
SurveyFacLens: Transferable Probe for Foreseeing Non-Factuality in Large Language Models
Despite advancements in large language models (LLMs), non-factual responses remain prevalent. Unlike extensive studies on post-hoc detection of such responses, this work studies non-factuality prediction (NFP), aiming to…
Transfer LearningAlleviating Hallucinations in Large Language Models with Scepticism Modeling
Hallucinations is a major challenge for large language models (LLMs), prevents adoption in diverse fields. Uncertainty estimation could be used for alleviating the damages of hallucinations. The skeptical emotion of huma…