Selection, Ignorability and Challenges With Causal Fairness
In this paper we look at popular fairness methods that use causal counterfactuals. These methods capture the intuitive notion that a prediction is fair if it coincides with the prediction that would have been made if someone's race, gender or religion were counterfactually different. In order to achieve this, we must have causal models that are able to capture what someone would be like if we were to counterfactually change these traits. However, we argue that any model that can do this must lie outside the particularly well behaved class that is commonly considered in the fairness literature. This is because in fairness settings, models in this class entail a particularly strong causal assumption, normally only seen in a randomised controlled trial. We argue that in general this is unlikely to hold. Furthermore, we show in many cases it can be explicitly rejected due to the fact that samples are selected from a wider population. We show this creates difficulties for counterfactual fairness as well as for the application of more general causal fairness methods.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
counterfactualFairnessSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Causal Mediation Analysis with Hidden Confounders
An important problem in causal inference is to break down the total effect of a treatment on an outcome into different causal pathways and to quantify the causal effect in each pathway. For instance, in causal fairness, …
Causal InferenceFairnessA Framework of decision-relevant observability: Reinforcement Learning converges under relative ignorability
From clinical dosing algorithms to autonomous robots, sequential decision-making systems routinely operate with missing or incomplete data. Classical reinforcement learning theory, which is commonly used to solve sequent…
Causal InferenceDecision MakingLearning TheoryQ-Learning+3Topological Ignorability for Structural Causal Effects Beyond Means
Many interventions alter the structure of an outcome distribution rather than its mean: they can split a population into disconnected regimes, create loops or holes, generate branches, or reorganize an outcome cloud whil…
Beyond Means: Topological Causal Effects under Persistent-Homology Ignorability
Average treatment effects (ATE) and conditional average treatment effects (CATE) are foundational causal estimands, but they target changes in expected outcomes and can miss treatment-induced changes in the shape of outc…
Decomposing Discrimination: Causal Mediation Analysis for AI-Driven Credit Decisions
Statistical fairness metrics in AI-driven credit decisions conflate two causally distinct mechanisms: discrimination operating directly from a protected attribute to a credit outcome, and structural inequality propagatin…