paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Self-Revising Discovery Systems for Science: A Categorical Framework for Agentic Artificial Intelligence

2026-05-31 · Fiona Y. Wang, Markus J. Buehler arxiv

Scientific discovery is not only answer generation but revision of the representational regime in which evidence, artifacts, operations, and verifiers are typed. We develop a category-theoretic account of agentic discovery for materials science. In a fixed regime b with schema category S_b, the system state is a copresheaf I_t: S_b -> Set, and provenance is the category of elements \int_{S_b} I_t. Fixed-regime operation is an update on such states, endofunctorial only when provenance-preserving refinements are specified and preserved. Discovery is instead a verified regime transition u: S_b -> S_b': old artifacts are preserved, transported by the left Kan extension Lan_u I_t, and compared with the post-transition state to identify residual content beyond functorial transport. This separates retrieval, search, and discovery without subjective novelty. We instantiate the framework in two systems. In Builder/Breaker, a protein-mechanics world model is revised under a Minimum Description Length gate; the accepted law expresses within-chain flexibility as all-mode elastic compliance conditioned by slow collective-mode participation, or mode-conditioned compliance. In CategoryScienceClaw, typed skills, artifacts, open needs, workflow mutation, gates, stress tests, and public discourse become a proof-carrying knowledge-computation graph. A fiber-network example records candidate models, rejected alternatives, an AIC gate, perturbation tests, and an accepted orientation-tensor anisotropic stiffness surrogate over an isotropic fiber-count descriptor. Together, the cases show how category theory can be both a mathematical language for discovery and an engineering specification for self-revising AI discovery systems.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2606.01444

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Answer Generation

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Separable Pathways for Causal Reasoning: How Architectural Scaffolding Enables Hypothesis-Space Restructuring in LLM Agents

2026-04-21 · John Alderete, Sebastian Benthal, Connie Xu, John Xing arxiv

Causal discovery through experimentation and intervention is fundamental to robust problem solving. It requires not just updating beliefs within a fixed framework but revising the hypothesis space itself, a capacity curr…

AI4X Roadmap: Artificial Intelligence for the advancement of scientific pursuit and its future directions

2025-11-26 · Stephen G. Dale, Nikita Kazeev, Alastair J. A. Price, Victor Posligua 외 arxiv

Artificial intelligence and machine learning are reshaping how we approach scientific discovery, not by replacing established methods but by extending what researchers can probe, predict, and design. In this roadmap we p…

Active Learning

AI for Open Science: A Multi-Agent Perspective for Ethically Translating Data to Knowledge

2023-10-28 · Chase Yakaboski, Gregory Hyde, Clement Nyanhongo, Eugene Santos Jr

AI for Science (AI4Science), particularly in the form of self-driving labs, has the potential to sideline human involvement and hinder scientific discovery within the broader community. While prior research has focused o…

scientific discoveryTranslation

Categorical data clustering: 25 years beyond K-modes

2024-08-30 · Tai Dinh, Wong Hauchi, Philippe Fournier-Viger, Daniil Lisik 외

The clustering of categorical data is a common and important task in computer science, offering profound implications across a spectrum of applications. Unlike purely numerical data, categorical data often lack inherent …

Categorical data clusteringClustering

Ordinal Causal Discovery

2022-01-19 · Yang Ni, Bani Mallick

Causal discovery for purely observational, categorical data is a long-standing challenging problem. Unlike continuous data, the vast majority of existing methods for categorical data focus on inferring the Markov equival…

Causal Discovery