paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Silent Sabotage During Fine-Tuning: Few-Shot Rationale Poisoning of Compact Medical LLMs

2026-02-28 · Jingyuan Xie, Wenjie Wang, Ji Wu, Jiandong Gao arxiv

Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) is essential for the development of medical large language models (LLMs), yet prior poisoning studies have mainly focused on the detectable backdoor attacks. We propose a novel poisoning attack targeting the reasoning process of medical LLMs during SFT. Unlike backdoor attacks, our method injects poisoned rationales into few-shot training data, leading to stealthy degradation of model performance on targeted medical topics. Results showed that knowledge overwriting was ineffective, while rationale poisoning caused significant decline on the accuracy of the target subject, as long as no correct samples of the same subject appear in the dataset. A minimum number and ratio of poisoned samples was needed to carry out an effective and stealthy attack, which was more efficient and accurate than catastrophic forgetting. We demonstrate though this study the risk of SFT-stage poisoning, hoping to spur more studies of defense in the sensitive medical domain.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2603.02262

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Preserving Silent Features for Domain Generalization

2024-01-06 · Chujie Zhao, Tianren Zhang, Feng Chen

Domain generalization (DG) aims to improve the generalization ability of the model trained on several known training domains over unseen test domains. Previous work has shown that self-supervised contrastive pre-training…

Contrastive LearningDomain Generalization

LipLearner: Customizable Silent Speech Interactions on Mobile Devices

2023-02-12 · Zixiong Su, Shitao Fang, Jun Rekimoto

Silent speech interface is a promising technology that enables private communications in natural language. However, previous approaches only support a small and inflexible vocabulary, which leads to limited expressivenes…

Contrastive LearningIncremental LearningKeyword SpottingLipreading+1

Gram: Assessing sabotage propensities via automated alignment auditing

2026-05-28 · David Lindner, Victoria Krakovna, Sebastian Farquhar arxiv

We introduce Gram, an automated alignment auditing framework to assess the propensity of AI agents to engage in sabotage. We evaluate Gemini models across 17 simulated agentic deployment scenarios that incentivize sabota…

Evaluating whether AI models would sabotage AI safety research

2026-04-27 · Robert Kirk, Alexandra Souly, Kai Fronsdal, Abby D'Cruz 외 arxiv

We evaluate the propensity of frontier models to sabotage or refuse to assist with safety research when deployed as AI research agents within a frontier AI company. We apply two complementary evaluations to four Claude m…

Auditing Sabotage Bench: A Benchmark for Detecting and Fixing Research Sabotage in ML Codebases

2026-04-17 · Eric Gan, Aryan Bhatt, Buck Shlegeris, Julian Stastny 외 arxiv

As AI systems are increasingly used to conduct research autonomously, misaligned systems could introduce subtle flaws that produce misleading results while evading detection. We introduce Auditing Sabotage Bench, a bench…