Silent Sabotage During Fine-Tuning: Few-Shot Rationale Poisoning of Compact Medical LLMs
Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) is essential for the development of medical large language models (LLMs), yet prior poisoning studies have mainly focused on the detectable backdoor attacks. We propose a novel poisoning attack targeting the reasoning process of medical LLMs during SFT. Unlike backdoor attacks, our method injects poisoned rationales into few-shot training data, leading to stealthy degradation of model performance on targeted medical topics. Results showed that knowledge overwriting was ineffective, while rationale poisoning caused significant decline on the accuracy of the target subject, as long as no correct samples of the same subject appear in the dataset. A minimum number and ratio of poisoned samples was needed to carry out an effective and stealthy attack, which was more efficient and accurate than catastrophic forgetting. We demonstrate though this study the risk of SFT-stage poisoning, hoping to spur more studies of defense in the sensitive medical domain.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Preserving Silent Features for Domain Generalization
Domain generalization (DG) aims to improve the generalization ability of the model trained on several known training domains over unseen test domains. Previous work has shown that self-supervised contrastive pre-training…
Contrastive LearningDomain GeneralizationLipLearner: Customizable Silent Speech Interactions on Mobile Devices
Silent speech interface is a promising technology that enables private communications in natural language. However, previous approaches only support a small and inflexible vocabulary, which leads to limited expressivenes…
Contrastive LearningIncremental LearningKeyword SpottingLipreading+1Gram: Assessing sabotage propensities via automated alignment auditing
We introduce Gram, an automated alignment auditing framework to assess the propensity of AI agents to engage in sabotage. We evaluate Gemini models across 17 simulated agentic deployment scenarios that incentivize sabota…
Evaluating whether AI models would sabotage AI safety research
We evaluate the propensity of frontier models to sabotage or refuse to assist with safety research when deployed as AI research agents within a frontier AI company. We apply two complementary evaluations to four Claude m…
Auditing Sabotage Bench: A Benchmark for Detecting and Fixing Research Sabotage in ML Codebases
As AI systems are increasingly used to conduct research autonomously, misaligned systems could introduce subtle flaws that produce misleading results while evading detection. We introduce Auditing Sabotage Bench, a bench…