paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Smaller Confidence Intervals From IPW Estimators via Data-Dependent Coarsening

2024-10-02 · Alkis Kalavasis, Anay Mehrotra, Manolis Zampetakis

Inverse propensity-score weighted (IPW) estimators are prevalent in causal inference for estimating average treatment effects in observational studies. Under unconfoundedness, given accurate propensity scores and $n$ samples, the size of confidence intervals of IPW estimators scales down with $n$, and, several of their variants improve the rate of scaling. However, neither IPW estimators nor their variants are robust to inaccuracies: even if a single covariate has an $\varepsilon>0$ additive error in the propensity score, the size of confidence intervals of these estimators can increase arbitrarily. Moreover, even without errors, the rate with which the confidence intervals of these estimators go to zero with $n$ can be arbitrarily slow in the presence of extreme propensity scores (those close to 0 or 1). We introduce a family of Coarse IPW (CIPW) estimators that captures existing IPW estimators and their variants. Each CIPW estimator is an IPW estimator on a coarsened covariate space, where certain covariates are merged. Under mild assumptions, e.g., Lipschitzness in expected outcomes and sparsity of extreme propensity scores, we give an efficient algorithm to find a robust estimator: given $\varepsilon$-inaccurate propensity scores and $n$ samples, its confidence interval size scales with $\varepsilon+1/\sqrt{n}$. In contrast, under the same assumptions, existing estimators' confidence interval sizes are $\Omega(1)$ irrespective of $\varepsilon$ and $n$. Crucially, our estimator is data-dependent and we show that no data-independent CIPW estimator can be robust to inaccuracies.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2410.01658

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Causal Inference

Methods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론

Causal inference Causal inference is the process of drawing a conclusion about a causal connection based on the conditions of the occurrence of an effect. The main difference between causal…

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Cross-validation Confidence Intervals for Test Error

2020-07-24 · NeurIPS 2020 12 · Pierre Bayle, Alexandre Bayle, Lucas Janson, Lester Mackey

This work develops central limit theorems for cross-validation and consistent estimators of its asymptotic variance under weak stability conditions on the learning algorithm. Together, these results provide practical, as…

valid

Confidence Intervals for Selected Parameters

2019-06-02 · Yoav Benjamini, Yotam Hechtlinger, Philip B. Stark

Practical or scientific considerations often lead to selecting a subset of parameters as ``important.'' Inferences about those parameters often are based on the same data used to select them in the first place. That can …

Communication-Efficient Distributed Estimation and Inference for Cox's Model

2023-02-23 · Pierre Bayle, Jianqing Fan, Zhipeng Lou

Motivated by multi-center biomedical studies that cannot share individual data due to privacy and ownership concerns, we develop communication-efficient iterative distributed algorithms for estimation and inference in th…

valid

Confidence intervals for intentionally biased estimators

2025-02-01 · David M. Kaplan, Xin Liu

We propose and study three confidence intervals (CIs) centered at an estimator that is intentionally biased to reduce mean squared error. The first CI simply uses an unbiased estimator's standard error; compared to cente…

Confidence Sets Based on Thresholding Estimators in High-Dimensional Gaussian Regression Models

2013-08-14 · Ulrike Schneider

We study confidence intervals based on hard-thresholding, soft-thresholding, and adaptive soft-thresholding in a linear regression model where the number of regressors $k$ may depend on and diverge with sample size $n$. …

regressionVariable Selection