paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Spread Spurious Attribute: Improving Worst-group Accuracy with Spurious Attribute Estimation

2022-04-05 · ICLR 2022 4 · Junhyun Nam, Jaehyung Kim, Jaeho Lee, Jinwoo Shin

The paradigm of worst-group loss minimization has shown its promise in avoiding to learn spurious correlations, but requires costly additional supervision on spurious attributes. To resolve this, recent works focus on developing weaker forms of supervision -- e.g., hyperparameters discovered with a small number of validation samples with spurious attribute annotation -- but none of the methods retain comparable performance to methods using full supervision on the spurious attribute. In this paper, instead of searching for weaker supervisions, we ask: Given access to a fixed number of samples with spurious attribute annotations, what is the best achievable worst-group loss if we "fully exploit" them? To this end, we propose a pseudo-attribute-based algorithm, coined Spread Spurious Attribute (SSA), for improving the worst-group accuracy. In particular, we leverage samples both with and without spurious attribute annotations to train a model to predict the spurious attribute, then use the pseudo-attribute predicted by the trained model as supervision on the spurious attribute to train a new robust model having minimal worst-group loss. Our experiments on various benchmark datasets show that our algorithm consistently outperforms the baseline methods using the same number of validation samples with spurious attribute annotations. We also demonstrate that the proposed SSA can achieve comparable performances to methods using full (100%) spurious attribute supervision, by using a much smaller number of annotated samples -- from 0.6% and up to 1.5%, depending on the dataset.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2204.02070

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Attribute

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Improving Group Robustness on Spurious Correlation Requires Preciser Group Inference

2024-04-22 · Yujin Han, Difan Zou

Standard empirical risk minimization (ERM) models may prioritize learning spurious correlations between spurious features and true labels, leading to poor accuracy on groups where these correlations do not hold. Mitigati…

Attribute

Correct-N-Contrast: A Contrastive Approach for Improving Robustness to Spurious Correlations

2022-03-03 · Michael Zhang, Nimit S. Sohoni, Hongyang R. Zhang, Chelsea Finn 외

Spurious correlations pose a major challenge for robust machine learning. Models trained with empirical risk minimization (ERM) may learn to rely on correlations between class labels and spurious attributes, leading to p…

AttributeContrastive Learning

Trained Models Tell Us How to Make Them Robust to Spurious Correlation without Group Annotation

2024-10-07 · Mahdi Ghaznavi, Hesam Asadollahzadeh, Fahimeh Hosseini Noohdani, Soroush Vafaie Tabar 외

Classifiers trained with Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM) tend to rely on attributes that have high spurious correlation with the target. This can degrade the performance on underrepresented (or 'minority') groups that …

FairnessModel SelectionOut-of-Distribution Generalization

Label-Efficient Group Robustness via Out-of-Distribution Concept Curation

2024-01-01 · CVPR 2024 1 · Yiwei Yang, Anthony Z. Liu, Robert Wolfe, Aylin Caliskan 외

Deep neural networks are prone to capture correlations between spurious attributes and class labels leading to low accuracy on some combinations of class labels and spurious attribute values. When a spurious attribut…

Attributeimage-classificationImage Classification

Dual-Branch Cross-Projection Debiasing through Diffusion-based Disentanglement

2026-06-23 · Xiangqian Zhao, Xinyang Jiang, Zhipeng Xu, Lingfeng He 외 arxiv

Foundation models trained on biased datasets often rely on spurious correlations between target labels and non-causal attributes, resulting in poor generalization on minority groups. Bias mitigation remains challenging d…