Structural Diversity Drives Disruptive Scientific Innovation
Scientific innovation increasingly depends on collaboration, yet the organizational structure that fosters breakthrough ideas remains poorly understood. Existing metrics - such as team size or compositional diversity - capture readily observable characteristics but not the deeper architecture of collaboration. We introduce Structural Diversity (SD): the extent to which a team bridges multiple distinct knowledge communities within its prior collaboration network. Using a century-scale dataset of 260 million scientific publications (1900-2025) and combining causal inference with a quasi-natural experiment based on a U.S. National Science Foundation policy change in 2012, we show that SD is a powerful and robust predictor of disruptive innovation, outperforming traditional team novelty indicators such as team freshness and edge density. Moreover, SD positively interacts with team size and is able to mitigate the well-known "curse of scale" by transforming scale from a liability into a resource for creative synthesis. We find that one mechanism underlying this effect is Disciplinary Integration (DI): teams with higher SD can more effectively combine heterogeneous knowledge into novel configurations. Our findings position SD as both a new theoretical construct and an actionable design principle for organizing scientific collaboration. By linking the architecture of team assembly to the dynamics of creative discovery, our work offers a structural explanation for how collective intelligence can be systematically engineered to foster disruptive innovation.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Causal InferenceSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Structuring Scientific Innovation: A Framework for Modeling and Discovering Impactful Knowledge Combinations
The emergence of large language models offers new possibilities for structured exploration of scientific knowledge. Rather than viewing scientific discovery as isolated ideas or content, we propose a structured approach …
Contrastive Learningscientific discoveryThe Illusive Slump of Disruptive Patents
Despite tremendous growth in the volume of new scientific and technological knowledge, the popular press has recently raised concerns that disruptive innovative activity is slowing. These dire prognoses were mainly drive…
Decision MakingEvolutionary Computation as Natural Generative AI
Generative AI (GenAI) has achieved remarkable success across a range of domains, but its capabilities remain constrained to statistical models of finite training sets and learning based on local gradient signals. This of…
The Diversity-Innovation Paradox in Science
Prior work finds a diversity paradox: diversity breeds innovation, and yet, underrepresented groups that diversify organizations have less successful careers within them. Does the diversity paradox hold for scientists as…
DiversityOn the Diversity of Analogy Making in Large Language Models
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable potential for analogy making, a core cognitive capability that drives novelty and creativity. While prior research has extensively investigated the applications a…