Structure-Based Function Prediction of Functionally Unannotated Structures in the PDB: Prediction of ATP, GTP, Sialic Acid, Retinoic Acid and Heme-bound and -Unbound (Free) Nitric Oxide Protein Binding Sites
Due to increased activity in high-throughput structural genomics efforts around the globe, there has been an accumulation of experimental protein 3D structures lacking functional annotation, thus creating a need for structure-based protein function assignment methods. Computational prediction of ligand binding sites (LBS) is a well-established protein function assignment method. Here we apply the specific LBS detection algorithm we recently described (Reyes, V.M. & Sheth, V.N., 2011; Reyes, V.M., 2015a) to some 801 functionally unannotated experimental structures in the Protein Data Bank by screening for the binding sites (BS) of 6 biologically important ligands: GTP in small Ras-type G-proteins, ATP in ser/thr protein kinases, sialic acid (SIA), retinoic acid (REA), and heme-bound and unbound (free) nitric oxide (hNO, fNO). Validation of the algorithm for the GTP- and ATP-binding sites has been previously described in detail (ibid.); here, validation for the BSs of the 4 other ligands shows both good specificity and sensitivity. Of the 801 structures screened, 8 tested positive for GTP binding, 61 for ATP binding, 35 for SIA binding, 132 for REA binding, 33 for hNO binding, and 10 for fNO binding. Using the cutting plane and tangent sphere methods we described previously, (Reyes, V.M., 2015b), we also determined the depth of burial of the LBSs detected above and compared the values with those from the respective training structures, and the degree of similarity between the two values taken as a further validation of the predicted LBSs. Applying this criterion, we were able to narrow down the predicted GTP-binding proteins to 2, the ATP-binding proteins to 13, the SIA-binding proteins to 2, the REA-binding proteins to 14, the hNO-binding proteins to 4, and the fNO-binding proteins to 1. We believe this further criterion increases the confidence level of our LBS predictions.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
SpecificitySimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Interpretable RNA Foundation Model from Unannotated Data for Highly Accurate RNA Structure and Function Predictions
Non-coding RNA structure and function are essential to understanding various biological processes, such as cell signaling, gene expression, and post-transcriptional regulations. These are all among the core problems in t…
Self-Supervised LearningRemixing Functionally Graded Structures: Data-Driven Topology Optimization with Multiclass Shape Blending
To create heterogeneous, multiscale structures with unprecedented functionalities, recent topology optimization approaches design either fully aperiodic systems or functionally graded structures, which compete in terms o…
DiversityData-driven biological network alignment that uses topological, sequence, and functional information
Many proteins remain functionally unannotated. Sequence alignment (SA) uncovers missing annotations by transferring functional knowledge between species' sequence-conserved regions. Because SA is imperfect, network align…
Network EmbeddingGenerating Tertiary Protein Structures via an Interpretative Variational Autoencoder
Much scientific enquiry across disciplines is founded upon a mechanistic treatment of dynamic systems that ties form to function. A highly visible instance of this is in molecular biology, where an important goal is to d…
Protein Structure PredictionStochastic OptimizationBioBlobs: Unsupervised Discovery of Functional Substructures for Protein Function Prediction
Protein function is driven by cohesive substructures, such as catalytic triads, binding pockets, and structural motifs, that occupy only a small fraction of a protein's residues. Yet existing pipelines built on protein e…
Protein Function Prediction