Structure-Specific Representational Priors Causally Control the Grokking Delay
Grokking -- generalization long after training-set interpolation -- has been accelerated by structure-agnostic interventions (gradient filtering, weight-norm clamping, geometric penalties). Whether the delay specifically measures the time to form task-structured representations has remained observational. We test it causally by injecting representational priors of varying content into a one-layer transformer learning modular addition, via a supervised-contrastive loss whose positives encode (i) the task's true structure ($(a+b) \bmod p$), (ii) a coherent-but-wrong sibling ($(a-b) \bmod p$), or (iii) a random partition -- all with identical loss form, strength, class sizes, and geometry. Whether generalization occurs follows a clean gradation: true 22/30 runs, sibling (same periodic features, wrong combination) 14/15, random (only memorizable) 0/20 (Fisher $p=1.3\times10^{-7}$). A weight-norm-matched control replaying the norm trajectory onto plain cross-entropy generalizes 0/15, ruling out the norm as mediator. Probes show structure formation precedes and predicts generalization in all runs. Only the true structure also accelerates grokking (up to $2.75\times$), but this is dose-dependent and bimodal. We then confirm the mechanism by prediction: because the acceleration is gated by a weight-norm side-effect, clamping the norm during training yields a reliable, standalone accelerator with a median $8.6\times$ speedup (up to $22\times$ on the fastest seeds, under 1000 epochs), growing monotonically as the norm is held lower; the residual stalls also vanish, though significant only pooled over the two mitigations run at both strengths ($0/40$ vs $6/20$, $p=7.7\times10^{-4}$), not per method. The grokking delay is, causally, the time to form the right representational structure -- decided at the level of features, not labels.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Emergent Causal-Geometric Dynamics Across Depth in Large Language Models
Geometric analyses of large language model (LLM) representations reveal structured variation across depth but remain fundamentally correlational with respect to token prediction formation. Meanwhile, causal interventions…
Cross-Model Semantics in Representation Learning
The internal representations learned by deep networks are often sensitive to architecture-specific choices, raising questions about the stability, alignment, and transferability of learned structure across models. In thi…
Representation LearningModel Alignment Search
When can we say that two neural systems are the same? The answer to this question is goal-dependent, and it is often addressed through correlative methods such as Representational Similarity Analysis (RSA) and Centered K…
counterfactualmodelActionable Activation Directions for Detecting and Mitigating Emergent Misalignment Across Language Model Families
Fine-tuning language models on insecure code induces emergent misalignment with poorly understood internal structure. We investigate whether this misalignment corresponds to a causally actionable activation-space directi…
Causally-Guided Automated Feature Engineering with Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
Automated feature engineering (AFE) enables AI systems to autonomously construct high-utility representations from raw tabular data. However, existing AFE methods rely on statistical heuristics, yielding brittle features…
Multi-agent Reinforcement LearningFeature Engineering