paper-with-me

Papers

Supervised Optimism Correction: Be Confident When LLMs Are Sure

2025-04-10 · Junjie Zhang, Rushuai Yang, Shunyu Liu, Ting-En Lin, Fei Huang, Yi Chen, Yongbin Li, DaCheng Tao

In this work, we establish a novel theoretical connection between supervised fine-tuning and offline reinforcement learning under the token-level Markov decision process, revealing that large language models indeed learn an implicit $Q$-function for inference. Through this theoretical lens, we demonstrate that the widely used beam search method suffers from unacceptable over-optimism, where inference errors are inevitably amplified due to inflated $Q$-value estimations of suboptimal steps. To address this limitation, we propose Supervised Optimism Correction(SOC), which introduces a simple yet effective auxiliary loss for token-level $Q$-value estimations during supervised fine-tuning. Specifically, the auxiliary loss employs implicit value regularization to boost model confidence in expert-demonstrated responses, thereby suppressing over-optimism toward insufficiently supervised responses. Extensive experiments on mathematical reasoning benchmarks, including GSM8K, MATH, and GAOKAO, showcase the superiority of the proposed SOC with beam search across a series of open-source models.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2504.07527

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

GSM8KMathMathematical Reasoning

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Confidence v.s. Critique: A Decomposition of Self-Correction Capability for LLMs

2024-12-27 · Zhe Yang, Yichang Zhang, Yudong Wang, Ziyao Xu 외

Large Language Models (LLMs) can correct their self-generated responses, but a decline in accuracy after self-correction is also witnessed. To have a deeper understanding of self-correction, we endeavor to decompose, eva…

In-Context Learning

The Energy of Falsehood: Detecting Hallucinations via Diffusion Model Likelihoods

2026-02-11 · Arpit Singh Gautam, Kailash Talreja, Saurabh Jha arxiv

Large Language Models (LLMs) frequently hallucinate plausible but incorrect assertions, a vulnerability often missed by uncertainty metrics when models are confidently wrong. We propose DiffuTruth, an unsupervised framew…

Fact Verification

Is your noise correction noisy? PLS: Robustness to label noise with two stage detection

2022-10-10 · Paul Albert, Eric Arazo, Tarun Krishna, Noel E. O'Connor 외

Designing robust algorithms capable of training accurate neural networks on uncurated datasets from the web has been the subject of much research as it reduces the need for time consuming human labor. The focus of many p…

Pseudo Label

From Passive Response to Proactive Correction: Enhancing LLM Robustness Against Input Fact Perturbations

2026-08-26 · Ping Wang, Xiangguo Sun, Bingbing Xu, Guocong Li 외 arxiv

Large language models (LLMs) frequently produce confident yet factually incorrect responses when user inputs contain misleading premises, a phenomenon we attribute to fact perturbations in the input. Existing approaches …

UCorrect: An Unsupervised Framework for Automatic Speech Recognition Error Correction

2024-01-11 · Jiaxin Guo, Minghan Wang, Xiaosong Qiao, Daimeng Wei 외

Error correction techniques have been used to refine the output sentences from automatic speech recognition (ASR) models and achieve a lower word error rate (WER). Previous works usually adopt end-to-end models and has s…

Automatic Speech RecognitionAutomatic Speech Recognition (ASR)speech-recognitionSpeech Recognition