Supported Abstract Argumentation for Case-Based Reasoning
We introduce Supported Abstract Argumentation for Case-Based Reasoning (sAA-CBR), a binary classification model in which past cases engage in debates by arguing in favour of their labelling and attacking or supporting those with opposing or agreeing labels. With supports, sAA-CBR overcomes the limitation of its precursor AA-CBR, which can contain extraneous cases (or spikes) that are not included in the debates. We prove that sAA-CBR contains no spikes, without trading off key model properties
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Binary ClassificationSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Technical Report on the Learning of Case Relevance in Case-Based Reasoning with Abstract Argumentation
Case-based reasoning is known to play an important role in several legal settings. In this paper we focus on a recent approach to case-based reasoning, supported by an instantiation of abstract argumentation whereby argu…
Abstract ArgumentationSpecificityObject-Centric Case-Based Reasoning via Argumentation
We introduce Slot Attention Argumentation for Case-Based Reasoning (SAA-CBR), a novel neuro-symbolic pipeline for image classification that integrates object-centric learning via a neural Slot Attention (SA) component wi…
Multi-class ClassificationImage ClassificationPreference-Based Abstract Argumentation for Case-Based Reasoning (with Appendix)
In the pursuit of enhancing the efficacy and flexibility of interpretable, data-driven classification models, this work introduces a novel incorporation of user-defined preferences with Abstract Argumentation and Case-Ba…
Abstract ArgumentationInterpretable Machine LearningNeuro-Argumentative Learning with Case-Based Reasoning
We introduce Gradual Abstract Argumentation for Case-Based Reasoning (Gradual AA-CBR), a data-driven, neurosymbolic classification model in which the outcome is determined by an argumentation debate structure that is lea…
Abstract ArgumentationMulti-class ClassificationStability in Abstract Argumentation
The notion of stability in a structured argumentation setup characterizes situations where the acceptance status associated with a given literal will not be impacted by any future evolution of this setup. In this paper, …
Abstract Argumentation