Survival Analysis Using a 5-Step Stratified Testing and Amalgamation Routine in Randomized Clinical Trials
Randomized clinical trials are often designed to assess whether a test treatment prolongs survival relative to a control treatment. Increased patient heterogeneity, while desirable for generalizability of results, can weaken the ability of common statistical approaches to detect treatment differences, potentially hampering the regulatory approval of safe and efficacious therapies. A novel solution to this problem is proposed. A list of baseline covariates that have the potential to be prognostic for survival under either treatment is pre-specified in the analysis plan. At the analysis stage, using all observed survival times but blinded to patient-level treatment assignment, 'noise' covariates are removed with elastic net Cox regression. The shortened covariate list is used by a conditional inference tree algorithm to segment the heterogeneous trial population into subpopulations of prognostically homogeneous patients (risk strata). After patient-level treatment unblinding, a treatment comparison is done within each formed risk stratum and stratum-level results are combined for overall statistical inference. The impressive power-boosting performance of our proposed 5-step stratified testing and amalgamation routine (5-STAR), relative to that of the logrank test and other common approaches that do not leverage inherently structured patient heterogeneity, is illustrated using a hypothetical and two real datasets along with simulation results. Furthermore, the importance of reporting stratum-level comparative treatment effects (time ratios from accelerated failure time model fits in conjunction with model averaging and, as needed, hazard ratios from Cox proportional hazard model fits) is highlighted as a potential enabler of personalized medicine. A fiveSTAR R package is available at https://github.com/rmarceauwest/fiveSTAR.
Code (1)
Tasks
Survival AnalysisSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Communication-Efficient Federated Risk Difference Estimation for Time-to-Event Clinical Outcomes
Privacy-preserving model co-training in medical research is often hindered by server-dependent architectures incompatible with protected hospital data systems and by the predominant focus on relative effect measures (haz…
Federated LearningEPIC-Survival: End-to-end Part Inferred Clustering for Survival Analysis, Featuring Prognostic Stratification Boosting
Histopathology-based survival modelling has two major hurdles. Firstly, a well-performing survival model has minimal clinical application if it does not contribute to the stratification of a cancer patient cohort into di…
ClusteringSurvival Analysiswhole slide imagesSurvAgent: Hierarchical CoT-Enhanced Case Banking and Dichotomy-Based Multi-Agent System for Multimodal Survival Prediction
Survival analysis is critical for cancer prognosis and treatment planning, yet existing methods lack the transparency essential for clinical adoption. While recent pathology agents have demonstrated explainability in dia…
Equitable Survival Prediction: A Fairness-Aware Survival Modeling (FASM) Approach
As machine learning models become increasingly integrated into healthcare, structural inequities and social biases embedded in clinical data can be perpetuated or even amplified by data-driven models. In survival analysi…
A Multiple kernel testing procedure for non-proportional hazards in factorial designs
In this paper we propose a Multiple kernel testing procedure to infer survival data when several factors (e.g. different treatment groups, gender, medical history) and their interaction are of interest simultaneously. Ou…
Survival Analysis