Syntopical Graphs for Computational Argumentation Tasks
Approaches to computational argumentation tasks such as stance detection and aspect detection have largely focused on the text of independent claims, losing out on potentially valuable context provided by the rest of the collection. We introduce a general approach to these tasks motivated by syntopical reading, a reading process that emphasizes comparing and contrasting viewpoints in order to improve topic understanding. To capture collection-level context, we introduce the syntopical graph, a data structure for linking claims within a collection. A syntopical graph is a typed multi-graph where nodes represent claims and edges represent different possible pairwise relationships, such as entailment, paraphrase, or support. Experiments applying syntopical graphs to the problems of detecting stance and aspects demonstrate state-of-the-art performance in each domain, significantly outperforming approaches that do not utilize collection-level information.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Stance DetectionSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Hi-ArG: Exploring the Integration of Hierarchical Argumentation Graphs in Language Pretraining
The knowledge graph is a structure to store and represent knowledge, and recent studies have discussed its capability to assist language models for various applications. Some variations of knowledge graphs aim to record …
Knowledge GraphsExpert Stance Graphs for Computational Argumentation
Interpreting Neural Networks as Gradual Argumentation Frameworks (Including Proof Appendix)
We show that an interesting class of feed-forward neural networks can be understood as quantitative argumentation frameworks. This connection creates a bridge between research in Formal Argumentation and Machine Learning…
BIG-bench Machine LearningStructure-Aware Encodings of Argumentation Properties for Clique-width
Structural measures of graphs, such as treewidth, are central tools in computational complexity resulting in efficient algorithms when exploiting the parameter. It is even known that modern SAT solvers work efficiently o…
Splitting Assumption-Based Argumentation Frameworks
Assumption-Based Argumentation (ABA) is a well-established formalism for modelling and reasoning over debates, with a wide range of applications. However, the high computational complexity of core reasoning tasks in ABA …