paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Systematic Literature Review on Clinical Trial Eligibility Matching

2025-03-02 · Muhammad Talha Sharif, Abdul Rehman

Clinical trial eligibility matching is a critical yet often labor-intensive and error-prone step in medical research, as it ensures that participants meet precise criteria for safe and reliable study outcomes. Recent advances in Natural Language Processing (NLP) have shown promise in automating and improving this process by rapidly analyzing large volumes of unstructured clinical text and structured electronic health record (EHR) data. In this paper, we present a systematic overview of current NLP methodologies applied to clinical trial eligibility screening, focusing on data sources, annotation practices, machine learning approaches, and real-world implementation challenges. A comprehensive literature search (spanning Google Scholar, Mendeley, and PubMed from 2015 to 2024) yielded high-quality studies, each demonstrating the potential of techniques such as rule-based systems, named entity recognition, contextual embeddings, and ontology-based normalization to enhance patient matching accuracy. While results indicate substantial improvements in screening efficiency and precision, limitations persist regarding data completeness, annotation consistency, and model scalability across diverse clinical domains. The review highlights how explainable AI and standardized ontologies can bolster clinician trust and broaden adoption. Looking ahead, further research into advanced semantic and temporal representations, expanded data integration, and rigorous prospective evaluations is necessary to fully realize the transformative potential of NLP in clinical trial recruitment.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2503.00863

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Data Integrationnamed-entity-recognitionNamed Entity RecognitionSystematic Literature Review

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Eligibility-Aware Evidence Synthesis: An Agentic Framework for Clinical Trial Meta-Analysis

2026-04-03 · Yao Zhao, Zhiyue Zhang, Yanxun Xu arxiv

Clinical evidence synthesis requires identifying relevant trials from large registries and aggregating results that account for population differences. While recent LLM-based approaches have automated components of syste…

AI-assisted workflow enables rapid, high-fidelity breast cancer clinical trial eligibility prescreening

2025-11-07 · Jacob T. Rosenthal, Emma Hahesy, Sulov Chalise, Menglei Zhu 외 arxiv

Clinical trials play an important role in cancer care and research, yet participation rates remain low. We developed MSK-MATCH (Memorial Sloan Kettering Multi-Agent Trial Coordination Hub), an AI system for automated eli…

A systematic review of trial-matching pipelines using large language models

2025-09-13 · Braxton A. Morrison, Madhumita Sushil, Jacob S. Young arxiv

Matching patients to clinical trial options is critical for identifying novel treatments, especially in oncology. However, manual matching is labor-intensive and error-prone, leading to recruitment delays. Pipelines inco…

TrialPanorama: Database and Benchmark for Systematic Review and Design of Clinical Trials

2025-05-22 · Zifeng Wang, Qiao Jin, Jiacheng Lin, Junyi Gao 외

Developing artificial intelligence (AI) for vertical domains requires a solid data foundation for both training and evaluation. In this work, we introduce TrialPanorama, a large-scale, structured database comprising 1,65…

Toward an AI Reasoning-Enabled System for Patient-Clinical Trial Matching

2025-12-08 · Caroline N. Leach, Mitchell A. Klusty, Samuel E. Armstrong, Justine C. Pickarski 외 arxiv

Screening patients for clinical trial eligibility remains a manual, time-consuming, and resource-intensive process. We present a secure, scalable proof-of-concept system for Artificial Intelligence (AI)-augmented patient…

Binary Classification