paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

The Blessings of Multiple Causes

2018-05-17 · Yixin Wang, David M. Blei

Causal inference from observational data often assumes "ignorability," that all confounders are observed. This assumption is standard yet untestable. However, many scientific studies involve multiple causes, different variables whose effects are simultaneously of interest. We propose the deconfounder, an algorithm that combines unsupervised machine learning and predictive model checking to perform causal inference in multiple-cause settings. The deconfounder infers a latent variable as a substitute for unobserved confounders and then uses that substitute to perform causal inference. We develop theory for the deconfounder, and show that it requires weaker assumptions than classical causal inference. We analyze its performance in three types of studies: semi-simulated data around smoking and lung cancer, semi-simulated data around genome-wide association studies, and a real dataset about actors and movie revenue. The deconfounder provides a checkable approach to estimating closer-to-truth causal effects.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:1805.06826

Code (2)

blei-lab/deconfounder_tutorial
rajat641/CSE-472-Causality-Study

Tasks

Causal Inference

Methods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론

Causal inference Causal inference is the process of drawing a conclusion about a causal connection based on the conditions of the occurrence of an effect. The main difference between causal…

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

The Blessings of Multiple Causes: A Reply to Ogburn et al. (2019)

2019-10-15 · Yixin Wang, David M. Blei

Ogburn et al. (2019, arXiv:1910.05438) discuss "The Blessings of Multiple Causes" (Wang and Blei, 2018, arXiv:1805.06826). Many of their remarks are interesting. But they also claim that the paper has "foundational error…

Multiple Causes: A Causal Graphical View

2019-05-30 · Yixin Wang, David M. Blei

Unobserved confounding is a major hurdle for causal inference from observational data. Confounders---the variables that affect both the causes and the outcome---induce spurious non-causal correlations between the two. Wa…

Causal Inferencevalid

Counterexamples to "The Blessings of Multiple Causes" by Wang and Blei

2020-01-17 · Elizabeth L. Ogburn, Ilya Shpitser, Eric J. Tchetgen Tchetgen

This note has been updated (April, 2020) to respond to "Towards Clarifying the Theory of the Deconfounder" by Yixin Wang, David M. Blei (arXiv:2003.04948). This original note, posted in January, 2020, is meant to complem…

Comment on "Blessings of Multiple Causes"

2019-10-11 · Elizabeth L. Ogburn, Ilya Shpitser, Eric J. Tchetgen Tchetgen

(This comment has been updated to respond to Wang and Blei's rejoinder [arXiv:1910.07320].) The premise of the deconfounder method proposed in "Blessings of Multiple Causes" by Wang and Blei [arXiv:1805.06826], namely th…

Causal Inferencevalid

Discussion of "The Blessings of Multiple Causes" by Wang and Blei

2019-10-15 · Kosuke Imai, Zhichao Jiang

This commentary has two goals. We first critically review the deconfounder method and point out its advantages and limitations. We then briefly consider three possible ways to address some of the limitations of the decon…