paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

The Few Govern the Many:Unveiling Few-Layer Dominance for Time Series Models

2025-11-10 · Xin Qiu, Junlong Tong, Yirong Sun, Yunpu Ma, Xiaoyu Shen arxiv

Large-scale models are at the forefront of time series (TS) forecasting, dominated by two paradigms: fine-tuning text-based Large Language Models (LLM4TS) and training Time Series Foundation Models (TSFMs) from scratch. Both approaches share a foundational assumption that scaling up model capacity and data volume leads to improved performance. However, we observe a \textit{\textbf{scaling paradox}} in TS models, revealing a puzzling phenomenon that larger models do \emph{NOT} achieve better performance. Through extensive experiments on two model families across four scales (100M to 1.7B parameters) and diverse data (up to 6B observations), we rigorously confirm that the scaling paradox is a pervasive issue. We then diagnose its root cause by analyzing internal representations, identifying a phenomenon we call \textit{few-layer dominance}: only a small subset of layers are functionally important, while the majority are redundant, under-utilized, and can even distract training. Based on this discovery, we propose a practical method to automatically identify and retain only these dominant layers. In our models, retaining only 21\% of the parameters achieves up to a 12\% accuracy improvement and a 2.7$\times$ inference speedup. We validate the universality of our method on 8 prominent SOTA models (LLM4TS and TSFMs, 90M to 6B), showing that retaining less than 30\% of layers achieves comparable or superior accuracy in over 95\% of tasks.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2511.07237

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Unveiling Affective Polarization Trends in Parliamentary Proceedings

2025-12-04 · Gili Goldin, Ella Rabinovich, Shuly Wintner arxiv

Recent years have seen an increase in polarized discourse worldwide, on various platforms. We propose a novel method for quantifying polarization, based on the emotional style of the discourse rather than on differences …

Brain-LLM Alignment Tracks Training Data, Not Typology

2026-05-21 · Dongxin Guo, Jikun Wu, Siu Ming Yiu arxiv

Brain-LLM alignment is well established in English, yet the brain's language network is neuroanatomically universal across languages. Does alignment also generalize cross-linguistically, and what governs the variation? W…

Crosswashing in Sustainable Investing: Unveiling Strategic Practices Impacting ESG Scores

2024-03-21 · Bertrand Kian Hassani, Yacoub Bahini

This paper introduces and defines a novel concept in sustainable investing, termed crosswashing, and explore its impact on ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) ratings through quantitative analysis using a Multi-C…

Decision Making

Computable Fairness: Boltzmann-Softmax Control for AI Resource Allocation

2026-04-12 · Ji-Won Park, Chae Un Kim arxiv

In large-scale AI systems, allocating scarce resources such as GPU compute time and bandwidth among multiple agents is a critical challenge. Conventional policies focus on efficiency metrics, potentially leading to domin…

AdaTask: A Task-aware Adaptive Learning Rate Approach to Multi-task Learning

2022-11-28 · Enneng Yang, Junwei Pan, Ximei Wang, Haibin Yu 외

Multi-task learning (MTL) models have demonstrated impressive results in computer vision, natural language processing, and recommender systems. Even though many approaches have been proposed, how well these approaches ba…

Multi-Task LearningRecommendation Systems