paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

The Moral Burden of Ambiguity Aversion

2020-04-19 · Brian Jabarian

In their article, "Egalitarianism under Severe Uncertainty", Philosophy and Public Affairs, 46:3, 2018, Thomas Rowe and Alex Voorhoeve develop an original moral decision theory for cases under uncertainty, called "pluralist egalitarianism under uncertainty". In this paper, I firstly sketch their views and arguments. I then elaborate on their moral decision theory by discussing how it applies to choice scenarios in health ethics. Finally, I suggest a new two-stage Ellsberg thought experiment challenging the core of the principle of their theory. In such an experiment pluralist egalitarianism seems to suggest the wrong, morally and rationally speaking, course of action -- no matter whether I consider my thought experiment in a simultaneous or a sequential setting.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2004.08892

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

EthicsPhilosophy

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

New Formulations of Ambiguous Volatility with an Application to Optimal Dynamic Contracting

2021-01-28 · Peter G. Hansen

I introduce novel preference formulations which capture aversion to ambiguity about unknown and potentially time-varying volatility. I compare these preferences with Gilboa and Schmeidler's maxmin expected utility as wel…

Optimal Investment with Stochastic Interest Rates and Ambiguity

2023-06-23 · Julian Hölzermann

This paper studies dynamic asset allocation with interest rate risk and several sources of ambiguity. The market consists of a risk-free asset, a zero-coupon bond (both determined by a Vasicek model), and a stock. There …

An Ellsberg paradox for ambiguity aversion

2022-12-07 · Christoph Kuzmics, Brian W. Rogers, Xiannong Zhang

The 1961 Ellsberg paradox is typically seen as an empirical challenge to the subjective expected utility framework. Experiments based on Ellsberg's design have spawned a variety of new approaches, culminating in a new pa…

Absolute and Relative Ambiguity Attitudes

2024-06-03 · Francesco Fabbri, Giulio Principi, Lorenzo Stanca

We represent preferences that exhibit absolute or relative attitudes towards ambiguity without assuming convexity of preferences. Our analysis is motivated by the recent experimental evidence by Baillon and Placido (2019…

Randomization advice and ambiguity aversion

2023-01-09 · Christoph Kuzmics, Brian W. Rogers, Xiannong Zhang

We design and implement lab experiments to evaluate the normative appeal of behavior arising from models of ambiguity-averse preferences. We report two main empirical findings. First, we demonstrate that behavior reflect…

Decision MakingPosition