The multiplicity of memory enhancement: Practical and ethical implications of the diverse neural substrates underlying human memory systems
The neural basis of human memory is incredibly complex. We argue that the diversity of neural systems underlying various forms of memory suggests that any discussion of enhancing 'memory' per se is too broad, thus obfuscating the biopolitical debate about human enhancement. Memory can be differentiated into at least four major (and several minor) systems with largely dissociable (i.e., non-overlapping) neural substrates. We outline each system, and discuss both the practical and the ethical implications of these diverse neural substrates. In practice, distinct neural bases imply the possibility, and likely the necessity, of specific approaches for the safe and effective enhancement of various memory systems. In the debate over the ethical and social implications of enhancement technologies, this fine-grained perspective clarifies - and may partially mitigate - certain common concerns in enhancement debates, including issues related to safety, fairness, coercion, and authenticity. While many researchers certainly appreciate the neurobiological complexity of memory, the political debate tends to revolve around a monolithic one-size-fits-all conception. The overall project - exploring how human enhancement technologies affect society - stands to benefit from a deeper appreciation of memory's neurobiological diversity.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
DiversityFairnessSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Towards Ethical Personal AI Applications: Practical Considerations for AI Assistants with Long-Term Memory
One application area of long-term memory (LTM) capabilities with increasing traction is personal AI companions and assistants. With the ability to retain and contextualize past interactions and adapt to user preferences,…
The Dataset Multiplicity Problem: How Unreliable Data Impacts Predictions
We introduce dataset multiplicity, a way to study how inaccuracies, uncertainty, and social bias in training datasets impact test-time predictions. The dataset multiplicity framework asks a counterfactual question of wha…
counterfactualDelegating Responsibilities to Intelligent Autonomous Systems: Challenges and Benefits
As AI systems increasingly operate with autonomy and adaptability, the traditional boundaries of moral responsibility in techno-social systems are being challenged. This paper explores the evolving discourse on the deleg…
EthicsCan Large Language Models Differentiate Harmful from Argumentative Essays? Steps Toward Ethical Essay Scoring
This study addresses critical gaps in Automated Essay Scoring (AES) systems and Large Language Models (LLMs) with regard to their ability to effectively identify and score harmful essays. Despite advancements in AES tech…
Automated Essay ScoringDecomposing Observational Multiplicity in Decision Trees: Leaf and Structural Regret
Many machine learning tasks admit multiple models that perform almost equally well, a phenomenon known as predictive multiplicity. A fundamental source of this multiplicity is observational multiplicity, which arises fro…