paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

The Predictive-Causal Gap: An Impossibility Theorem and Large-Scale Neural Evidence

2026-05-06 · Kejun Liu arxiv

We report a systematic failure mode in predictive representation learning. Across 2695 neural network configurations trained to predict linear-Gaussian dynamics, the optimal encoder tracks the environment rather than the system it is meant to model. The mean causal fidelity -- the fraction of encoder sensitivity allocated to system degrees of freedom -- is 0.49, and only 2.5% of configurations exceed 0.70. The failure intensifies with dimension: at N=100, the optimal encoder becomes causally blind (fidelity ~10^{-8}) while achieving 92% lower prediction error than the causal representation. We prove this is not an optimization artifact but a structural property of the predictive objective: when environment modes are slower or less noisy than system modes, every minimizer of the population risk encodes the former. The set of dynamics exhibiting this predictive-causal gap is open and of positive measure in parameter space. In a nonlinear Duffing-GRU sweep, unconstrained predictors learn environment-dominant representations in 55% of tasks (95% CI 41--68%) versus 24% under operational grounding (p=2.3e-3); the median out-of-distribution MSE inflation under environment shift is 1.82x versus 1.00x. Operational grounding -- restricting the loss to system observables -- partially suppresses the gap, but causal fidelity is never recovered without an explicit system-environment boundary. The results identify the predictive-causal gap as a structural limit of learning, with implications for self-supervised representation learning, world models, and the scaling paradigm.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2605.05029

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Representation Learning

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

The Impossibility Theorem of Machine Fairness -- A Causal Perspective

2020-07-12 · Kailash Karthik Saravanakumar

With the increasing pervasive use of machine learning in social and economic settings, there has been an interest in the notion of machine bias in the AI community. Models trained on historic data reflect biases that exi…

Fairness

The Possibility of Fairness: Revisiting the Impossibility Theorem in Practice

2023-02-13 · Andrew Bell, Lucius Bynum, Nazarii Drushchak, Tetiana Herasymova 외

The ``impossibility theorem'' -- which is considered foundational in algorithmic fairness literature -- asserts that there must be trade-offs between common notions of fairness and performance when fitting statistical mo…

Fairness

The Attribution Impossibility: No Feature Ranking Is Faithful, Stable, and Complete Under Collinearity

2026-04-08 · Drake Caraker, Bryan Arnold, David Rhoads arxiv

No feature ranking can be simultaneously faithful, stable, and complete when features are collinear. For collinear pairs, ranking reduces to a coin flip. We prove this impossibility, quantify it for four model classes, r…

The Accountability Horizon: An Impossibility Theorem for Governing Human-Agent Collectives

2026-04-09 · Haileleol Tibebu, Hewan Shemtaga arxiv

Existing accountability frameworks for AI systems, legal, ethical, and regulatory, rest on a shared assumption: for any consequential outcome, at least one identifiable person had enough involvement and foresight to bear…

Causal Networks and Freedom of Choice in Bell's Theorem

2021-05-12 · Rafael Chaves, George Moreno, Emanuele Polino, Davide Poderini 외

Bell's theorem is typically understood as the proof that quantum theory is incompatible with local-hidden-variable models. More generally, we can see the violation of a Bell inequality as witnessing the impossibility of …