The Sparse Vector Technique, Revisited
We revisit one of the most basic and widely applicable techniques in the literature of differential privacy - the sparse vector technique [Dwork et al., STOC 2009]. This simple algorithm privately tests whether the value of a given query on a database is close to what we expect it to be. It allows to ask an unbounded number of queries as long as the answer is close to what we expect, and halts following the first query for which this is not the case. We suggest an alternative, equally simple, algorithm that can continue testing queries as long as any single individual does not contribute to the answer of too many queries whose answer deviates substantially form what we expect. Our analysis is subtle and some of its ingredients may be more widely applicable. In some cases our new algorithm allows to privately extract much more information from the database than the original. We demonstrate this by applying our algorithm to the shifting heavy-hitters problem: On every time step, each of $n$ users gets a new input, and the task is to privately identify all the current heavy-hitters. That is, on time step $i$, the goal is to identify all data elements $x$ such that many of the users have $x$ as their current input. We present an algorithm for this problem with improved error guarantees over what can be obtained using existing techniques. Specifically, the error of our algorithm depends on the maximal number of times that a single user holds a heavy-hitter as input, rather than the total number of times in which a heavy-hitter exists.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Eigenbackground Revisited: Can We Model the Background with Eigenvectors?
Using dominant eigenvectors for background modeling (usually known as Eigenbackground) is a common technique in the literature. However, its results suffer from noticeable artifacts. Thus have been many attempts to reduc…
Bus Admittance Matrix Revisited: Is It Outdated on Modern Computers?
Bus admittance matrix is widely used in power engineering for modeling networks. Being highly sparse, it requires fewer CPU operations when used for calculations. Meanwhile, sparse matrix calculations involve numerous in…
CPUDifferentially Private Matrix Completion Revisited
We provide the first provably joint differentially private algorithm with formal utility guarantees for the problem of user-level privacy-preserving collaborative filtering. Our algorithm is based on the Frank-Wolfe meth…
Collaborative FilteringMatrix CompletionPrivacy PreservingSafe and Efficient Screening For Sparse Support Vector Machine
Screening is an effective technique for speeding up the training process of a sparse learning model by removing the features that are guaranteed to be inactive the process. In this paper, we present a efficient screening…
Sparse LearningByzantine-Robust Distributed Sparse Learning Revisited
We revisit Byzantine robust distributed estimation for high-dimensional sparse linear models. By combining local $\ell_1$-regularized robust estimation with robust aggregation at the server, the framework applies to pseu…
Sparse Learning