The Three-Ring Architecture: Governing Agents in the Era of On-Platform Organisations
The current phase of enterprise AI deployment faces a structural failure: organisations are acquiring agentic capability without the infrastructure to govern it. The result is expected to reproduce the error of the first wave of AI deployment: decentralised intelligence without a federation layer leading to a 95% project failure rate. This paper formalises the Three-Ring Architecture as the governing infrastructure of the on-platform organisation. Ring 1 is the existing production architecture; Ring 2 is the M2 federation layer built on strategies-based agentic AI; Ring 3 is the LLM-based frontier intelligence layer. Ring 2 constitutes, in the technically exact sense, the operating system of the agentic enterprise - performing at the organisational level what a computing OS performs at the device level: resource abstraction, process coordination, permission enforcement, and a stable platform for compounding intelligence. A central contribution is the formal distinction between Ring 2 and Ring 3 risk profiles. Strategies-based agents operate within a deterministic framework: their consequences are traceable, their permissions enforceable, their deviations recoverable. LLM-based agents introduce a categorically distinct risk: a non-deterministic actor whose deviations propagate through complex organisational systems without retrospective traceability. Ring 2 is not a useful addition - it is a necessary condition of control and compliance. A further consequence: every improvement in LLM capability is a structural tailwind for this architecture. More capable non-deterministic actors produce larger consequences when they deviate. The governance requirement scales with capability. The architecture has been validated across a decade of deployment in financial services, government, procurement, and compliance among other sectors.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Governing Cloud Data Pipelines with Agentic AI
Cloud data pipelines increasingly operate under dynamic workloads, evolving schemas, cost constraints, and strict governance requirements. Despite advances in cloud-native orchestration frameworks, most production pipeli…
Agentic AI platforms for autonomous training and rule induction of human-human and virus-human protein-protein interactions
We instruct an AI agent to construct two separate agentic AI platforms: one for autonomous training of predictive ML models for human-human and virus-human PPI, and the other for inducing explicit general rules governing…
Predictability and Fairness in Social Sensing
We consider the design of distributed algorithms that govern the manner in which agents contribute to a social sensing platform. Specifically, we are interested in situations where fairness among the agents contributing …
FairnessThe User Asks, Platforms Compete: How Agentic Recommendation Markets Take Shape
Online recommendation has traditionally taken place after a user enters a platform, which determines the candidate pool and the ranking shown to the user. LLM-based user agents enable a different recommendation process: …
SAGA: A Security Architecture for Governing AI Agentic Systems
Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents increasingly interact, collaborate, and delegate tasks to one another autonomously with minimal human interaction. Industry guidelines for agentic system governance emphasize the n…
Large Language Model