paper-with-me

Papers

The Three-Ring Architecture: Governing Agents in the Era of On-Platform Organisations

2026-06-05 · Sergio Alvarez-Telena, Marta Diez-Fernandez arxiv

The current phase of enterprise AI deployment faces a structural failure: organisations are acquiring agentic capability without the infrastructure to govern it. The result is expected to reproduce the error of the first wave of AI deployment: decentralised intelligence without a federation layer leading to a 95% project failure rate. This paper formalises the Three-Ring Architecture as the governing infrastructure of the on-platform organisation. Ring 1 is the existing production architecture; Ring 2 is the M2 federation layer built on strategies-based agentic AI; Ring 3 is the LLM-based frontier intelligence layer. Ring 2 constitutes, in the technically exact sense, the operating system of the agentic enterprise - performing at the organisational level what a computing OS performs at the device level: resource abstraction, process coordination, permission enforcement, and a stable platform for compounding intelligence. A central contribution is the formal distinction between Ring 2 and Ring 3 risk profiles. Strategies-based agents operate within a deterministic framework: their consequences are traceable, their permissions enforceable, their deviations recoverable. LLM-based agents introduce a categorically distinct risk: a non-deterministic actor whose deviations propagate through complex organisational systems without retrospective traceability. Ring 2 is not a useful addition - it is a necessary condition of control and compliance. A further consequence: every improvement in LLM capability is a structural tailwind for this architecture. More capable non-deterministic actors produce larger consequences when they deviate. The governance requirement scales with capability. The architecture has been validated across a decade of deployment in financial services, government, procurement, and compliance among other sectors.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2606.07119

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Governing Cloud Data Pipelines with Agentic AI

2025-12-24 · Aswathnarayan Muthukrishnan Kirubakaran, Adithya Parthasarathy, Nitin Saksena, Ram Sekhar Bodala 외 arxiv

Cloud data pipelines increasingly operate under dynamic workloads, evolving schemas, cost constraints, and strict governance requirements. Despite advances in cloud-native orchestration frameworks, most production pipeli…

Agentic AI platforms for autonomous training and rule induction of human-human and virus-human protein-protein interactions

2026-04-27 · Hung N. Do, Jessica Z. Kubicek-Sutherland, Oscar A. Negrete, S. Gnanakaran arxiv

We instruct an AI agent to construct two separate agentic AI platforms: one for autonomous training of predictive ML models for human-human and virus-human PPI, and the other for inducing explicit general rules governing…

Predictability and Fairness in Social Sensing

2020-07-31 · Ramen Ghosh, Jakub Marecek, Wynita M. Griggs, Matheus Souza 외

We consider the design of distributed algorithms that govern the manner in which agents contribute to a social sensing platform. Specifically, we are interested in situations where fairness among the agents contributing …

Fairness

The User Asks, Platforms Compete: How Agentic Recommendation Markets Take Shape

2026-07-28 · Deyao Hong, Kehan Zheng, Qian Li, Jun Zhang 외 arxiv

Online recommendation has traditionally taken place after a user enters a platform, which determines the candidate pool and the ranking shown to the user. LLM-based user agents enable a different recommendation process: …

SAGA: A Security Architecture for Governing AI Agentic Systems

2025-04-27 · Georgios Syros, Anshuman Suri, Cristina Nita-Rotaru, Alina Oprea

Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents increasingly interact, collaborate, and delegate tasks to one another autonomously with minimal human interaction. Industry guidelines for agentic system governance emphasize the n…

Large Language Model