Theory of Deep Learning III: explaining the non-overfitting puzzle
A main puzzle of deep networks revolves around the absence of overfitting despite large overparametrization and despite the large capacity demonstrated by zero training error on randomly labeled data. In this note, we show that the dynamics associated to gradient descent minimization of nonlinear networks is topologically equivalent, near the asymptotically stable minima of the empirical error, to linear gradient system in a quadratic potential with a degenerate (for square loss) or almost degenerate (for logistic or crossentropy loss) Hessian. The proposition depends on the qualitative theory of dynamical systems and is supported by numerical results. Our main propositions extend to deep nonlinear networks two properties of gradient descent for linear networks, that have been recently established (1) to be key to their generalization properties: 1. Gradient descent enforces a form of implicit regularization controlled by the number of iterations, and asymptotically converges to the minimum norm solution for appropriate initial conditions of gradient descent. This implies that there is usually an optimum early stopping that avoids overfitting of the loss. This property, valid for the square loss and many other loss functions, is relevant especially for regression. 2. For classification, the asymptotic convergence to the minimum norm solution implies convergence to the maximum margin solution which guarantees good classification error for "low noise" datasets. This property holds for loss functions such as the logistic and cross-entropy loss independently of the initial conditions. The robustness to overparametrization has suggestive implications for the robustness of the architecture of deep convolutional networks with respect to the curse of dimensionality.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Deep LearningGeneral ClassificationMethods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Explaining versus Describing Human Decisions. Hilbert Space Structures in Decision Theory
Despite the impressive success of quantum structures to model long-standing human judgement and decision puzzles, the {\it quantum cognition research programme} still faces challenges about its explanatory power. Indeed,…
Decision MakingLinear Frequency Principle Model to Understand the Absence of Overfitting in Neural Networks
Why heavily parameterized neural networks (NNs) do not overfit the data is an important long standing open question. We propose a phenomenological model of the NN training to explain this non-overfitting puzzle. Our line…
Open-Ended Question AnsweringExplaining Puzzle Solutions in Natural Language: An Exploratory Study on 6x6 Sudoku
The success of Large Language Models (LLMs) in human-AI collaborative decision-making hinges on their ability to provide trustworthy, gradual, and tailored explanations. Solving complex puzzles, such as Sudoku, offers a …
Decision MakingA Cognitive Account of the Puzzle of Ideography
In this commentary article to 'The Puzzle of Ideography' by Morin, we put forth a new cognitive account of the puzzle of ideography, that complements the standardization account of Morin. Efficient standardization of spo…
ChunkingFILTRA: Rethinking Steerable CNN by Filter Transform
Steerable CNN imposes the prior knowledge of transformation invariance or equivariance in the network architecture to enhance the the network robustness on geometry transformation of data and reduce overfitting. It has b…