paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

TherapyGym: Evaluating and Aligning Clinical Fidelity and Safety in Therapy Chatbots

2026-02-23 · Fangrui Huang, Souhad Chbeir, Arpandeep Khatua, Sheng Wang, Sijun Tan, Kenan Ye, Lily Bailey, Merryn Daniel, Ryan Louie, Sanmi Koyejo, Ehsan Adeli arxiv

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for mental-health support; yet prevailing evaluation methods--fluency metrics, preference tests, and generic dialogue benchmarks--fail to capture the clinically critical dimensions of psychotherapy. We introduce THERAPYGYM, a framework that evaluates and improves therapy chatbots along two clinical pillars: fidelity and safety. Fidelity is measured using the Cognitive Therapy Rating Scale (CTRS), implemented as an automated pipeline that scores adherence to CBT techniques over multi-turn sessions. Safety is assessed using a multi-label annotation scheme, covering therapy-specific risks (e.g., failing to address harm or abuse). To mitigate bias and unreliability in LLM-based judges, we further release THERAPYJUDGEBENCH, a validation set of 116 dialogues with 1,270 expert ratings for auditing and calibration against licensed clinicians. THERAPYGYM also serves as a training harness: CTRS and safety-based rewards drive RL with configurable patient simulations spanning diverse symptom profiles. Models trained in THERAPYGYM improve on expert ratings, with average CTRS rising from 0.10 to 0.60 (and 0.16 to 0.59 under LLM judges). Our work enables scalable development of therapy chatbots that are faithful to evidence-based practice and safer in high-stakes use.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2603.18008

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

ETA: Evaluating Then Aligning Safety of Vision Language Models at Inference Time

2024-10-09 · Yi Ding, Bolian Li, Ruqi Zhang

Vision Language Models (VLMs) have become essential backbones for multimodal intelligence, yet significant safety challenges limit their real-world application. While textual inputs are often effectively safeguarded, adv…

Sentence

MedBench v4: A Robust and Scalable Benchmark for Evaluating Chinese Medical Language Models, Multimodal Models, and Intelligent Agents

2025-11-18 · Jinru Ding, Lu Lu, Chao Ding, Mouxiao Bian 외 arxiv

Recent advances in medical large language models (LLMs), multimodal models, and agents demand evaluation frameworks that reflect real clinical workflows and safety constraints. We present MedBench v4, a nationwide, cloud…

Multimodal Reasoning

ClinicalLab: Aligning Agents for Multi-Departmental Clinical Diagnostics in the Real World

2024-06-19 · Weixiang Yan, Haitian Liu, Tengxiao Wu, Qian Chen 외

LLMs have achieved significant performance progress in various NLP applications. However, LLMs still struggle to meet the strict requirements for accuracy and reliability in the medical field and face many challenges in …

DiagnosticMultiple-choiceText Generation

Metrics that matter: Evaluating image quality metrics for medical image generation

2025-05-12 · Yash Deo, Yan Jia, Toni Lassila, William A. P. Smith 외

Evaluating generative models for synthetic medical imaging is crucial yet challenging, especially given the high standards of fidelity, anatomical accuracy, and safety required for clinical applications. Standard evaluat…

Image GenerationMedical Image Generation

Beyond Literal Summarization: Redefining Hallucination for Medical SOAP Note Evaluation

2026-04-16 · Bhavik Vachhani, Kush Shrisvastava, Pranshu Nema, Sai Chiranthan arxiv

Evaluating large language models (LLMs) for clinical documentation tasks such as SOAP note generation remains challenging. Unlike standard summarization, these tasks require clinical abstraction, normalization of colloqu…