paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Thinking Traps in Long Chain-of-Thought: A Measurable Study and Trap-Aware Adaptive Restart

2026-01-17 · Kang Chen, Fan Yu, Junjie Nian, Shihan Zhao, Zhuoka Feng, Zijun Yao, Heng Wang, Minshen Yu, Yixin Cao arxiv

Scaling test-time compute via Long Chain-of-Thought (Long-CoT) significantly enhances reasoning capabilities, yet extended generation does not guarantee correctness: after an early wrong commitment, models may keep elaborating a self-consistent but incorrect prefix. Through fine-grained trajectory analysis, we identify Thinking Traps, prefix-dominant deadlocks where later reflection, alternative attempts, or verification fails to revise the root error. On a curated subset of DAPO-MATH, 89\% of failures exhibit such traps. To solve this problem, we introduce TAAR (Trap-Aware Adaptive Restart), a test-time control framework that trains a diagnostic policy to predict two signals from partial trajectories: a trap index for where to truncate and an escape probability for whether and how strongly to intervene. At inference time, TAAR truncates the trajectory before the predicted trap segment and adaptively restarts decoding; for severely trapped cases, it applies stronger perturbations, including higher-temperature resampling and an optional structured reboot suffix. Experiments on challenging mathematical and scientific reasoning benchmarks (AIME24, AIME25, GPQA-Diamond, HMMT25, BRUMO25) show that TAAR improves reasoning performance without fine-tuning base model parameters.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2601.11940

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Rethinking the Chain-of-Thought: The Roles of In-Context Learning and Pre-trained Priors

2025-09-01 · Hao Yang, Zhiyu Yang, Yunjie Zhang, Shanyi Zhu 외 arxiv

Chain-of-Thought reasoning has emerged as a pivotal methodology for enhancing model inference capabilities. Despite growing interest in Chain-of-Thought reasoning, its underlying mechanisms remain unclear. This paper exp…

Prompt EngineeringLogical Reasoning

Latent Reasoning with Supervised Thinking States

2026-02-09 · Ido Amos, Avi Caciularu, Mor Geva, Amir Globerson 외 arxiv

Reasoning with a chain-of-thought (CoT) enables Large Language Models (LLMs) to solve complex tasks but incurs significant inference costs due to the generation of long rationales. We propose Thinking States, a method th…

Do LLMs Really Need 10+ Thoughts for "Find the Time 1000 Days Later"? Towards Structural Understanding of LLM Overthinking

2025-10-09 · Xinliang Frederick Zhang, Anhad Mohananey, Alexandra Chronopoulou, Pinelopi Papalampidi 외 arxiv

Models employing long chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning have shown superior performance on complex reasoning tasks. Yet, this capability introduces a critical and often overlooked inefficiency -- overthinking -- models of…

Long-Short Chain-of-Thought Mixture Supervised Fine-Tuning Eliciting Efficient Reasoning in Large Language Models

2025-05-06 · Bin Yu, Hang Yuan, Haotian Li, Xueyin Xu 외

Recent advances in large language models have demonstrated that Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) with Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning data distilled from large reasoning models (e.g., DeepSeek R1) can effectively transfer r…

Revisiting Overthinking in Long Chain-of-Thought from the Perspective of Self-Doubt

2025-05-29 · Keqin Peng, Liang Ding, Yuanxin Ouyang, Meng Fang 외

Reasoning Large Language Models (RLLMs) have demonstrated impressive performance on complex tasks, largely due to the adoption of Long Chain-of-Thought (Long CoT) reasoning. However, they often exhibit overthinking -- pe…

Mathematical Reasoning