paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

To Use or to Refuse? Re-Centering Student Agency with Generative AI in Engineering Design Education

2025-10-22 · Thijs Willems, Sumbul Khan, Qian Huang, Bradley Camburn, Nachamma Sockalingam, King Wang Poon arxiv

This pilot study traces students' reflections on the use of AI in a 13-week foundational design course enrolling over 500 first-year engineering and architecture students at the Singapore University of Technology and Design. The course was an AI-enhanced design course, with several interventions to equip students with AI based design skills. Students were required to reflect on whether the technology was used as a tool (instrumental assistant), a teammate (collaborative partner), or neither (deliberate non-use). By foregrounding this three-way lens, students learned to use AI for innovation rather than just automation and to reflect on agency, ethics, and context rather than on prompt crafting alone. Evidence stems from coursework artefacts: thirteen structured reflection spreadsheets and eight illustrated briefs submitted, combined with notes of teachers and researchers. Qualitative coding of these materials reveals shared practices brought about through the inclusion of Gen-AI, including accelerated prototyping, rapid skill acquisition, iterative prompt refinement, purposeful "switch-offs" during user research, and emergent routines for recognizing hallucinations. Unexpectedly, students not only harnessed Gen-AI for speed but (enabled by the tool-teammate-neither triage) also learned to reject its outputs, invent their own hallucination fire-drills, and divert the reclaimed hours into deeper user research, thereby transforming efficiency into innovation. The implications of the approach we explore shows that: we can transform AI uptake into an assessable design habit; that rewarding selective non-use cultivates hallucination-aware workflows; and, practically, that a coordinated bundle of tool access, reflection, role tagging, and public recognition through competition awards allows AI based innovation in education to scale without compromising accountability.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2510.19342

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Comprehensive AI Literacy: The Case for Centering Human Agency

2025-12-18 · Sri Yash Tadimalla, Justin Cary, Gordon Hull, Jordan Register 외 arxiv

The rapid assimilation of Artificial Intelligence technologies into various facets of society has created a significant educational imperative that current frameworks are failing to effectively address. We are witnessing…

Human-Generative AI Collaborative Problem Solving Who Leads and How Students Perceive the Interactions

2024-05-19 · Gaoxia Zhu, Vidya Sudarshan, Jason Fok Kow, Yew Soon Ong

This research investigates distinct human-generative AI collaboration types and students' interaction experiences when collaborating with generative AI (i.e., ChatGPT) for problem-solving tasks and how these factors rela…

Instructor-Created Custom GPTs as Pedagogical Partners Fostering Immersion in Online Higher Education: Two Case Studies

2026-03-29 · Dennis Beck, Leonel Morgado arxiv

As online higher education expands, sustaining student engagement remains a critical challenge. This paper approaches immersive learning by investigating how custom GPTs foster immersion (as a state of deep mental involv…

Educational impacts of generative artificial intelligence on learning and performance of engineering students in China

2025-05-14 · Lei Fan, Kunyang Deng, Fangxue Liu

With the rapid advancement of generative artificial intelligence(AI), its potential applications in higher education have attracted significant attention. This study investigated how 148 students from diverse engineering…

SuperSkillsStack: Agency, Domain Knowledge, Imagination, and Taste in Human-AI Design Education

2026-03-07 · Qian Huang, King Wang Poon arxiv

This study examines how students integrate generative artificial intelligence (AI) into design projects through the lens of the SuperSkillsStack framework, which identifies four key human competencies for effective human…