paper-with-me

Papers

Towards Clinical AI Fairness: Filling Gaps in the Puzzle

2024-05-28 · Mingxuan Liu, Yilin Ning, Salinelat Teixayavong, Xiaoxuan Liu, Mayli Mertens, Yuqing Shang, Xin Li, Di Miao, Jie Xu, Daniel Shu Wei Ting, Lionel Tim-Ee Cheng, Jasmine Chiat Ling Ong, Zhen Ling Teo, Ting Fang Tan, Narrendar RaviChandran, Fei Wang, Leo Anthony Celi, Marcus Eng Hock Ong, Nan Liu

The ethical integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in healthcare necessitates addressing fairness-a concept that is highly context-specific across medical fields. Extensive studies have been conducted to expand the technical components of AI fairness, while tremendous calls for AI fairness have been raised from healthcare. Despite this, a significant disconnect persists between technical advancements and their practical clinical applications, resulting in a lack of contextualized discussion of AI fairness in clinical settings. Through a detailed evidence gap analysis, our review systematically pinpoints several deficiencies concerning both healthcare data and the provided AI fairness solutions. We highlight the scarcity of research on AI fairness in many medical domains where AI technology is increasingly utilized. Additionally, our analysis highlights a substantial reliance on group fairness, aiming to ensure equality among demographic groups from a macro healthcare system perspective; in contrast, individual fairness, focusing on equity at a more granular level, is frequently overlooked. To bridge these gaps, our review advances actionable strategies for both the healthcare and AI research communities. Beyond applying existing AI fairness methods in healthcare, we further emphasize the importance of involving healthcare professionals to refine AI fairness concepts and methods to ensure contextually relevant and ethically sound AI applications in healthcare.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2405.17921

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Fairness

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

ERL-MPP: Evolutionary Reinforcement Learning with Multi-head Puzzle Perception for Solving Large-scale Jigsaw Puzzles of Eroded Gaps

2025-04-13 · Xingke Song, Xiaoying Yang, Chenglin Yao, Jianfeng Ren 외

Solving jigsaw puzzles has been extensively studied. While most existing models focus on solving either small-scale puzzles or puzzles with no gap between fragments, solving large-scale puzzles with gaps presents distinc…

Combinatorial Optimization

Improving the Fairness of Chest X-ray Classifiers

2022-03-23 · Haoran Zhang, Natalie Dullerud, Karsten Roth, Lauren Oakden-Rayner 외

Deep learning models have reached or surpassed human-level performance in the field of medical imaging, especially in disease diagnosis using chest x-rays. However, prior work has found that such classifiers can exhibit …

Fairness

A Formal Characterization of the Local Search Topology of the Gap Heuristic

2017-05-12 · Richard Anthony Valenzano, Danniel Sihui Yang

The pancake puzzle is a classic optimization problem that has become a standard benchmark for heuristic search algorithms. In this paper, we provide full proofs regarding the local search topology of the gap heuristic fo…

Heuristic Search

FairLogue: A Toolkit for Intersectional Fairness Analysis in Clinical Machine Learning Models

2026-04-06 · Nick Souligne, Vignesh Subbian arxiv

Objective: Algorithmic fairness is essential for equitable and trustworthy machine learning in healthcare. Most fairness tools emphasize single-axis demographic comparisons and may miss compounded disparities affecting i…

DUCX: Decomposing Unfairness in Tool-Using Chest X-ray Agents

2026-02-28 · Zikang Xu, Ruinan Jin, Xiaoxiao Li arxiv

Fairness in medical agents is becoming critical as tool-using clinical AI systems orchestrate specialized vision and language modules for tasks such as chest X-ray question answering. While these medical AI agents can im…

Question Answering