paper-with-me

Papers

Towards Principled Evaluations of Sparse Autoencoders for Interpretability and Control

2024-05-14 · Aleksandar Makelov, George Lange, Neel Nanda

Disentangling model activations into meaningful features is a central problem in interpretability. However, the absence of ground-truth for these features in realistic scenarios makes validating recent approaches, such as sparse dictionary learning, elusive. To address this challenge, we propose a framework for evaluating feature dictionaries in the context of specific tasks, by comparing them against \emph{supervised} feature dictionaries. First, we demonstrate that supervised dictionaries achieve excellent approximation, control, and interpretability of model computations on the task. Second, we use the supervised dictionaries to develop and contextualize evaluations of unsupervised dictionaries along the same three axes. We apply this framework to the indirect object identification (IOI) task using GPT-2 Small, with sparse autoencoders (SAEs) trained on either the IOI or OpenWebText datasets. We find that these SAEs capture interpretable features for the IOI task, but they are less successful than supervised features in controlling the model. Finally, we observe two qualitative phenomena in SAE training: feature occlusion (where a causally relevant concept is robustly overshadowed by even slightly higher-magnitude ones in the learned features), and feature over-splitting (where binary features split into many smaller, less interpretable features). We hope that our framework will provide a useful step towards more objective and grounded evaluations of sparse dictionary learning methods.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2405.08366

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Dictionary Learning

Methods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론

Refunds@Expedia|||How do I get a full refund from Expedia? “How do I get a full refund from Expedia? How do I get a full refund from Expedia? – Call ☎️ +1-(888) 829 (0881) or +1-805-330-4056 or +1-805-330-4056 for Quick Help &…
Linear Layer A Linear Layer is a projection $\mathbf{XW + b}$.
Discriminative Fine-Tuning Discriminative Fine-Tuning is a fine-tuning strategy that is used for ULMFiT type models. Instead of using the same learning rate…
Multi-Head Attention 설명 없음
Dense Connections Dense Connections, or Fully Connected Connections, are a type of layer in a deep neural network that use a linear operation where every input is connected to every output…
Attention Dropout Attention Dropout is a type of dropout used in attention-based architectures, where elements are randomly dropped out of the…
Weight Decay 설명 없음
Cosine Annealing Cosine Annealing is a type of learning rate schedule that has the effect of starting with a large learning rate that is relatively rapidly decreased to a minimum value before…

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Multilingual Steering by Design: Multilingual Sparse Autoencoders and Principled Layer Selection

2026-05-21 · Yusser Al Ghussin, Daniil Gurgurov, Tanja Baeumel, Josef van Genabith 외 arxiv

Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) enable feature-level mechanistic interpretability and activation steering in large language models (LLMs), but SAE-based language control remains unreliable in multilingual settings: most SAEs …

Language IdentificationMachine Translation

Jumping Ahead: Improving Reconstruction Fidelity with JumpReLU Sparse Autoencoders

2024-07-19 · Senthooran Rajamanoharan, Tom Lieberum, Nicolas Sonnerat, Arthur Conmy 외

Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) are a promising unsupervised approach for identifying causally relevant and interpretable linear features in a language model's (LM) activations. To be useful for downstream tasks, SAEs need to…

Atlas-Alignment: Making Interpretability Transferable Across Language Models

2025-10-31 · Bruno Puri, Jim Berend, Sebastian Lapuschkin, Wojciech Samek arxiv

Interpretability is crucial for building safe, reliable, and controllable language models, yet existing interpretability pipelines remain costly and difficult to scale. Interpreting a new model typically requires trainin…

Semantic Retrieval

Which Sparse Autoencoder Features Are Real? Model-X Knockoffs for False Discovery Rate Control

2025-11-12 · Tsogt-Ochir Enkhbayar arxiv

Although sparse autoencoders (SAEs) are crucial for identifying interpretable features in neural networks, it is still challenging to distinguish between real computational patterns and erroneous correlations. We introdu…

Why Linear Interpretability Works: Invariant Subspaces as a Result of Architectural Constraints

2026-02-10 · Andres Saurez, Yousung Lee, Dongsoo Har arxiv

Linear probes and sparse autoencoders consistently recover meaningful structure from transformer representations -- yet why should such simple methods succeed in deep, nonlinear systems? We show this is not merely an emp…