paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Towards Responsible and Trustworthy Educational Data Mining: Comparing Symbolic, Sub-Symbolic, and Neural-Symbolic AI Methods

2025-04-01 · Danial Hooshyar, Eve Kikas, Yeongwook Yang, Gustav Šír, Raija Hämäläinen, Tommi Kärkkäinen, Roger Azevedo

Given the demand for responsible and trustworthy AI for education, this study evaluates symbolic, sub-symbolic, and neural-symbolic AI (NSAI) in terms of generalizability and interpretability. Our extensive experiments on balanced and imbalanced self-regulated learning datasets of Estonian primary school students predicting 7th-grade mathematics national test performance showed that symbolic and sub-symbolic methods performed well on balanced data but struggled to identify low performers in imbalanced datasets. Interestingly, symbolic and sub-symbolic methods emphasized different factors in their decision-making: symbolic approaches primarily relied on cognitive and motivational factors, while sub-symbolic methods focused more on cognitive aspects, learned knowledge, and the demographic variable of gender -- yet both largely overlooked metacognitive factors. The NSAI method, on the other hand, showed advantages by: (i) being more generalizable across both classes -- even in imbalanced datasets -- as its symbolic knowledge component compensated for the underrepresented class; and (ii) relying on a more integrated set of factors in its decision-making, including motivation, (meta)cognition, and learned knowledge, thus offering a comprehensive and theoretically grounded interpretability framework. These contrasting findings highlight the need for a holistic comparison of AI methods before drawing conclusions based solely on predictive performance. They also underscore the potential of hybrid, human-centered NSAI methods to address the limitations of other AI families and move us closer to responsible AI for education. Specifically, by enabling stakeholders to contribute to AI design, NSAI aligns learned patterns with theoretical constructs, incorporates factors like motivation and metacognition, and strengthens the trustworthiness and responsibility of educational data mining.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2504.00615

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Decision Making

Methods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론

SET Dynamic Sparse Training method where weight mask is updated randomly periodically

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Towards responsible AI for education: Hybrid human-AI to confront the Elephant in the room

2025-04-22 · Danial Hooshyar, Gustav Šír, Yeongwook Yang, Eve Kikas 외

Despite significant advancements in AI-driven educational systems and ongoing calls for responsible AI for education, several critical issues remain unresolved -- acting as the elephant in the room within AI in education…

BenchmarkingFairness

Machine Unlearning for Responsible and Adaptive AI in Education

2025-09-12 · Betty Mayeku, Sandra Hummel, Parisa Memarmoshrefi arxiv

Machine Unlearning (MU) has emerged as a promising approach to addressing persistent challenges in Machine Learning (ML) systems. By enabling the selective removal of learned data, MU introduces protective, corrective, a…

Human-Centric eXplainable AI in Education

2024-10-18 · Subhankar Maity, Aniket Deroy

As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes more integrated into educational environments, how can we ensure that these systems are both understandable and trustworthy? The growing demand for explainability in AI systems is …

Closing the AI Trust Gap: The Case for Independent Certification for Trustworthy AI

2026-07-17 · Trisevgeni Papakonstantinou, Cansu Canca, Farah Nanji, Waheedullah Pardess 외 arxiv

Over the past decade, responsible AI (RAI) has produced a substantial body of practice for identifying and mitigating the risks AI poses in high-stakes settings. Yet this work has not produced a market that rewards trust…

Incentives Of EdTech: A Systematic Review Of EduNLP Research

2026-05-13 · Gabrielle Gaudeau, Aoife O'Driscoll, Jasper Degraeuwe, Andrew Caines 외 arxiv

While the Natural Language Processing community has dedicated significant resources in developing educational technologies (EdTech) that support this shift, it remains unclear whose interests are being best served among …