paper-with-me

Papers

Towards Verifiable AI with Lightweight Cryptographic Proofs of Inference

2026-03-19 · Pranay Anchuri, Matteo Campanelli, Paul Cesaretti, Rosario Gennaro, Tushar M. Jois, Hasan S. Kayman, Tugce Ozdemir arxiv

When large AI models are deployed as cloud-based services, clients have no guarantee that responses are correct or were produced by the intended model. Rerunning inference locally is infeasible for large models, and existing cryptographic proof systems -- while providing strong correctness guarantees -- introduce prohibitive prover overhead (e.g., hundreds of seconds per query for billion-parameter models). We present a verification framework and protocol that replaces full cryptographic proofs with a lightweight, sampling-based approach grounded in statistical properties of neural networks. We formalize the conditions under which trace separation between functionally dissimilar models can be leveraged to argue the security of verifiable inference protocols. The prover commits to the execution trace of inference via Merkle-tree-based vector commitments and opens only a small number of entries along randomly sampled paths from output to input. This yields a protocol that trades soundness for efficiency, a tradeoff well-suited to auditing, large-scale deployment settings where repeated queries amplify detection probability, and scenarios with rationally incentivized provers who face penalties upon detection. Our approach reduces proving times by several orders of magnitude compared to state-of-the-art cryptographic proof systems, going from the order of minutes to the order of milliseconds, with moderately larger proofs. Experiments on ResNet-18 classifiers and Llama-2-7B confirm that common architectures exhibit the statistical properties our protocol requires, and that natural adversarial strategies (gradient-descent reconstruction, inverse transforms, logit swapping) fail to produce traces that evade detection. We additionally present a protocol in the refereed delegation model, where two competing servers enable correct output identification in a logarithmic number of rounds.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2603.19025

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Repurposing Backdoors for Good: Ephemeral Intrinsic Proofs for Verifiable Aggregation in Cross-silo Federated Learning

2026-03-11 · Xian Qin, Xue Yang, Xiaohu Tang arxiv

While Secure Aggregation (SA) protects update confidentiality in Cross-silo Federated Learning, it fails to guarantee aggregation integrity, allowing malicious servers to silently omit or tamper with updates. Existing ve…

Federated Learning

Tool Receipts, Not Zero-Knowledge Proofs: Practical Hallucination Detection for AI Agents

2026-03-09 · Abhinaba Basu arxiv

AI agents that execute tasks via tool calls frequently hallucinate results - fabricating tool executions, misstating output counts, or presenting inferences as facts. Recent approaches to verifiable AI inference rely on …

NANOZK: Layerwise Zero-Knowledge Proofs for Verifiable Large Language Model Inference

2026-03-17 · Zhaohui Geoffrey Wang arxiv

When users query proprietary LLM APIs, they receive outputs with no cryptographic assurance that the claimed model was actually used. Service providers could substitute cheaper models, apply aggressive quantization, or r…

A Framework for Cryptographic Verifiability of End-to-End AI Pipelines

2025-03-28 · Kar Balan, Robert Learney, Tim Wood

The increasing integration of Artificial Intelligence across multiple industry sectors necessitates robust mechanisms for ensuring transparency, trust, and auditability of its development and deployment. This topic is pa…

Misinformation

TensorCommitments: A Lightweight Verifiable Inference for Language Models

2026-02-13 · Oguzhan Baser, Elahe Sadeghi, Eric Wang, David Ribeiro Alves 외 arxiv

Most large language models (LLMs) run on external clouds: users send a prompt, pay for inference, and must trust that the remote GPU executes the LLM without any adversarial tampering. We critically ask how to achieve ve…