paper-with-me

Papers

Transformer-Based Language Model Surprisal Predicts Human Reading Times Best with About Two Billion Training Tokens

2023-04-22 · Byung-Doh Oh, William Schuler

Recent psycholinguistic studies have drawn conflicting conclusions about the relationship between the quality of a language model and the ability of its surprisal estimates to predict human reading times, which has been speculated to be due to the large gap in both the amount of training data and model capacity across studies. The current work aims to consolidate these findings by evaluating surprisal estimates from Transformer-based language model variants that vary systematically in the amount of training data and model capacity on their ability to predict human reading times. The results show that surprisal estimates from most variants with contemporary model capacities provide the best fit after seeing about two billion training tokens, after which they begin to diverge from humanlike expectations. Additionally, newly-trained smaller model variants reveal a 'tipping point' at convergence, after which the decrease in language model perplexity begins to result in poorer fits to human reading times. These results suggest that the massive amount of training data is mainly responsible for the poorer fit achieved by surprisal from larger pre-trained language models, and that a certain degree of model capacity is necessary for Transformer-based language models to capture humanlike expectations.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2304.11389

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Language ModelingLanguage Modelling

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Can Entropy Explain Successor Surprisal Effects in Reading?

2018-10-26 · WS 2019 1 · Marten van Schijndel, Tal Linzen

Human reading behavior is sensitive to surprisal: more predictable words tend to be read faster. Unexpectedly, this applies not only to the surprisal of the word that is currently being read, but also to the surprisal of…

Language ModelingLanguage Modelling

Linear Recency Bias During Training Improves Transformers' Fit to Reading Times

2024-09-17 · Christian Clark, Byung-Doh Oh, William Schuler

Recent psycholinguistic research has compared human reading times to surprisal estimates from language models to study the factors shaping human sentence processing difficulty. Previous studies have shown a strong fit be…

Sentence

Why Does Surprisal From Larger Transformer-Based Language Models Provide a Poorer Fit to Human Reading Times?

2022-12-23 · Byung-Doh Oh, William Schuler

This work presents a detailed linguistic analysis into why larger Transformer-based pre-trained language models with more parameters and lower perplexity nonetheless yield surprisal estimates that are less predictive of …

Modeling Human Reading with Neural Attention

2016-08-19 · EMNLP 2016 11 · Michael Hahn, Frank Keller

When humans read text, they fixate some words and skip others. However, there have been few attempts to explain skipping behavior with computational models, as most existing work has focused on predicting reading times (…

reinforcement-learningReinforcement LearningReinforcement Learning (RL)

Accounting for Agreement Phenomena in Sentence Comprehension with Transformer Language Models: Effects of Similarity-based Interference on Surprisal and Attention

2021-04-26 · NAACL (CMCL) 2021 6 · Soo Hyun Ryu, Richard L. Lewis

We advance a novel explanation of similarity-based interference effects in subject-verb and reflexive pronoun agreement processing, grounded in surprisal values computed from a pretrained large-scale Transformer model, G…

RetrievalSentence