Treatment Effect Estimation with Unobserved and Heterogeneous Confounding Variables
The estimation of the treatment effect is often biased in the presence of unobserved confounding variables which are commonly referred to as hidden variables. Although a few methods have been recently proposed to handle the effect of hidden variables, these methods often overlook the possibility of any interaction between the observed treatment variable and the unobserved covariates. In this work, we address this shortcoming by studying a multivariate response regression problem with both unobserved and heterogeneous confounding variables of the form $Y=A^T X+ B^T Z+ \sum_{j=1}^{p} C^T_j X_j Z + E$, where $Y \in \mathbb{R}^m$ are $m$-dimensional response variables, $X \in \mathbb{R}^p$ are observed covariates (including the treatment variable), $Z \in \mathbb{R}^K$ are $K$-dimensional unobserved confounders, and $E \in \mathbb{R}^m$ is the random noise. Allowing for the interaction between $X_j$ and $Z$ induces the heterogeneous confounding effect. Our goal is to estimate the unknown matrix $A$, the direct effect of the observed covariates or the treatment on the responses. To this end, we propose a new debiased estimation approach via SVD to remove the effect of unobserved confounding variables. The rate of convergence of the estimator is established under both the homoscedastic and heteroscedastic noises. We also present several simulation experiments and a real-world data application to substantiate our findings.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Sequential Deconfounding for Causal Inference with Unobserved Confounders
Using observational data to estimate the effect of a treatment is a powerful tool for decision-making when randomized experiments are infeasible or costly. However, observational data often yields biased estimates of tre…
Causal InferenceDecision MakingIntact-VAE: Estimating Treatment Effects under Unobserved Confounding
NOTE: This preprint has a flawed theoretical formulation. Please avoid it and refer to the ICLR22 publication https://openreview.net/forum?id=q7n2RngwOM. Also, arXiv:2109.15062 contains some new ideas on unobserved Confo…
Causal InferenceRepresentation LearningKernel Methods for Unobserved Confounding: Negative Controls, Proxies, and Instruments
Negative control is a strategy for learning the causal relationship between treatment and outcome in the presence of unmeasured confounding. The treatment effect can nonetheless be identified if two auxiliary variables a…
Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects by Combining Weak Instruments and Observational Data
Accurately predicting conditional average treatment effects (CATEs) is crucial in personalized medicine and digital platform analytics. Since the treatments of interest often cannot be directly randomized, observational …
Product RecommendationMultiple Causal Inference with Latent Confounding
Causal inference from observational data requires assumptions. These assumptions range from measuring confounders to identifying instruments. Traditionally, causal inference assumptions have focused on estimation of effe…
Causal Inference