paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

TripJudge: A Relevance Judgement Test Collection for TripClick Health Retrieval

2022-08-14 · Sophia Althammer, Sebastian Hofstätter, Suzan Verberne, Allan Hanbury

Robust test collections are crucial for Information Retrieval research. Recently there is a growing interest in evaluating retrieval systems for domain-specific retrieval tasks, however these tasks often lack a reliable test collection with human-annotated relevance assessments following the Cranfield paradigm. In the medical domain, the TripClick collection was recently proposed, which contains click log data from the Trip search engine and includes two click-based test sets. However the clicks are biased to the retrieval model used, which remains unknown, and a previous study shows that the test sets have a low judgement coverage for the Top-10 results of lexical and neural retrieval models. In this paper we present the novel, relevance judgement test collection TripJudge for TripClick health retrieval. We collect relevance judgements in an annotation campaign and ensure the quality and reusability of TripJudge by a variety of ranking methods for pool creation, by multiple judgements per query-document pair and by an at least moderate inter-annotator agreement. We compare system evaluation with TripJudge and TripClick and find that that click and judgement-based evaluation can lead to substantially different system rankings.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2208.06936

Code (1)

sophiaalthammer/tripjudge 공식 구현

Tasks

Information RetrievalRetrieval

Methods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론

Test 설명 없음

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

TripClick: The Log Files of a Large Health Web Search Engine

2021-03-14 · Navid Rekabsaz, Oleg Lesota, Markus Schedl, Jon Brassey 외

Click logs are valuable resources for a variety of information retrieval (IR) tasks. This includes query understanding/analysis, as well as learning effective IR models particularly when the models require large amounts …

Information RetrievalRetrieval

Limitations of Automatic Relevance Assessments with Large Language Models for Fair and Reliable Retrieval Evaluation

2024-11-20 · David Otero, Javier Parapar, Álvaro Barreiro

Offline evaluation of search systems depends on test collections. These benchmarks provide the researchers with a corpus of documents, topics and relevance judgements indicating which documents are relevant for each topi…

Information RetrievalRetrieval

Establishing Strong Baselines for TripClick Health Retrieval

2022-01-02 · Sebastian Hofstätter, Sophia Althammer, Mete Sertkan, Allan Hanbury

We present strong Transformer-based re-ranking and dense retrieval baselines for the recently released TripClick health ad-hoc retrieval collection. We improve the - originally too noisy - training data with a simple neg…

Re-RankingRetrieval

CODER: An efficient framework for improving retrieval through COntextual Document Embedding Reranking

2021-12-16 · George Zerveas, Navid Rekabsaz, Daniel Cohen, Carsten Eickhoff

Contrastive learning has been the dominant approach to training dense retrieval models. In this work, we investigate the impact of ranking context - an often overlooked aspect of learning dense retrieval models. In parti…

Contrastive LearningDocument EmbeddingRerankingRetrieval

SARA: A Collection of Sensitivity-Aware Relevance Assessments

2024-01-10 · Jack McKechnie, Graham McDonald

Large archival collections, such as email or government documents, must be manually reviewed to identify any sensitive information before the collection can be released publicly. Sensitivity classification has received a…

SensitivitySensitivity Classification