Triple Instrumented Difference-in-Differences
In this paper, we formalize a triple instrumented difference-in-differences (DID-IV). In this design, a triple Wald-DID estimand, which divides the difference-in-difference-in-differences (DDD) estimand of the outcome by the DDD estimand of the treatment, captures the local average treatment effect on the treated. The identifying assumptions mainly comprise a monotonicity assumption, and the common acceleration assumptions in the treatment and the outcome. We extend the canonical triple DID-IV design to staggered instrument cases. We also describe the estimation and inference in this design in practice.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
A Semiparametric Instrumented Difference-in-Differences Approach to Policy Learning
Recently, there has been a surge in methodological development for the difference-in-differences (DiD) approach to evaluate causal effects. Standard methods in the literature rely on the parallel trends assumption to ide…
Instrumented Difference-in-Differences with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects
Many studies exploit variation in policy adoption timing across units as an instrument for treatment. This paper formalizes the underlying identification strategy as an instrumented difference-in-differences (DID-IV). In…
Beyond Triplet Loss: Person Re-identification with Fine-grained Difference-aware Pairwise Loss
Person Re-IDentification (ReID) aims at re-identifying persons from different viewpoints across multiple cameras. Capturing the fine-grained appearance differences is often the key to accurate person ReID, because many i…
Person Re-IdentificationTripletConditional Triple Difference-in-Differences
Triple difference-in-differences designs are widely used to estimate causal effects in empirical work. Surveying the literature, we find that most applications include controls. We show that this standard practice is gen…
A Meta-learner for Heterogeneous Effects in Difference-in-Differences
We address the problem of estimating heterogeneous treatment effects in panel data, adopting the popular Difference-in-Differences (DiD) framework under the conditional parallel trends assumption. We propose a novel doub…
Meta-Learning