paper-with-me

Papers

TrustJudge: Inconsistencies of LLM-as-a-Judge and How to Alleviate Them

2025-09-25 · Yidong Wang, Yunze Song, Tingyuan Zhu, Xuanwang Zhang, Zhuohao Yu, Hao Chen, Chiyu Song, Qiufeng Wang, Cunxiang Wang, Zhen Wu, Xinyu Dai, Yue Zhang, Wei Ye, Shikun Zhang arxiv

The adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) as automated evaluators (LLM-as-a-judge) has revealed critical inconsistencies in current evaluation frameworks. We identify two fundamental types of inconsistencies: (1) Score-Comparison Inconsistency, where lower-rated responses outperform higher-scored ones in pairwise comparisons, and (2) Pairwise Transitivity Inconsistency, manifested through circular preference chains (A>B>C>A) and equivalence contradictions (A=B=C\neq A). We argue that these issues come from information loss in discrete rating systems and ambiguous tie judgments during pairwise evaluation. We propose TrustJudge, a probabilistic framework that addresses these limitations through two key innovations: 1) distribution-sensitive scoring that computes continuous expectations from discrete rating probabilities, preserving information entropy for more precise scoring, and 2) likelihood-aware aggregation that resolves transitivity violations using bidirectional preference probabilities or perplexity. We also formalize the theoretical limitations of current LLM-as-a-judge frameworks and demonstrate how TrustJudge's components overcome them. When evaluated with Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct as judge using our dataset, TrustJudge reduces Score-Comparison inconsistency by 8.43% (from 23.32% to 14.89%) and Pairwise Transitivity inconsistency by 10.82% (from 15.22% to 4.40%), while maintaining higher evaluation accuracy. Our work provides the first systematic analysis of evaluation framework inconsistencies in LLM-as-a-judge paradigms, offering both theoretical insights and practical solutions for reliable automated assessment. The framework demonstrates consistent improvements across various model architectures and scales, enabling more trustworthy LLM evaluation without requiring additional training or human annotations. The codes can be found at https://github.com/TrustJudge/TrustJudge.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2509.21117

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Applicability of Large Language Models and Generative Models for Legal Case Judgement Summarization

2024-07-06 · Aniket Deroy, Kripabandhu Ghosh, Saptarshi Ghosh

Automatic summarization of legal case judgements, which are known to be long and complex, has traditionally been tried via extractive summarization models. In recent years, generative models including abstractive summari…

Abstractive Text SummarizationExtractive Summarization

On Finding Inconsistencies in Documents

2025-12-21 · Charles J. Lovering, Seth Ebner, Brandon Smock, Michael Krumdick 외 arxiv

Professionals in academia, law, and finance audit their documents because inconsistencies can result in monetary, reputational, and scientific costs. Language models (LMs) have the potential to dramatically speed up this…

How Ready are Pre-trained Abstractive Models and LLMs for Legal Case Judgement Summarization?

2023-06-02 · Aniket Deroy, Kripabandhu Ghosh, Saptarshi Ghosh

Automatic summarization of legal case judgements has traditionally been attempted by using extractive summarization methods. However, in recent years, abstractive summarization models are gaining popularity since they ca…

Abstractive Text SummarizationExtractive SummarizationText Summarization

KNOW How to Make Up Your Mind! Adversarially Detecting and Alleviating Inconsistencies in Natural Language Explanations

2023-06-05 · Myeongjun Jang, Bodhisattwa Prasad Majumder, Julian McAuley, Thomas Lukasiewicz 외

While recent works have been considerably improving the quality of the natural language explanations (NLEs) generated by a model to justify its predictions, there is very limited research in detecting and alleviating inc…

Adversarial Attack

When Vision-Language Models Judge Without Seeing: Exposing Informativeness Bias

2026-04-20 · Xiaohan Zou, Roshan Sridhar, Mohammadtaher Safarzadeh, Dan Roth arxiv

The reliability of VLM-as-a-Judge is critical for the automatic evaluation of vision-language models (VLMs). Despite recent progress, our analysis reveals that VLM-as-a-Judge often pays limited attention to the image whe…