Trustworthy AI: Deciding What to Decide
When engaging in strategic decision-making, we are frequently confronted with overwhelming information and data. The situation can be further complicated when certain pieces of evidence contradict each other or become paradoxical. The primary challenge is how to determine which information can be trusted when we adopt Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems for decision-making. This issue is known as deciding what to decide or Trustworthy AI. However, the AI system itself is often considered an opaque black box. We propose a new approach to address this issue by introducing a novel framework of Trustworthy AI (TAI) encompassing three crucial components of AI: representation space, loss function, and optimizer. Each component is loosely coupled with four TAI properties. Altogether, the framework consists of twelve TAI properties. We aim to use this framework to conduct the TAI experiments by quantitive and qualitative research methods to satisfy TAI properties for the decision-making context. The framework allows us to formulate an optimal prediction model trained by the given dataset for applying the strategic investment decision of credit default swaps (CDS) in the technology sector. Finally, we provide our view of the future direction of TAI research
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Decision MakingSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
DRAGIN: Dynamic Retrieval Augmented Generation based on the Information Needs of Large Language Models
Dynamic retrieval augmented generation (RAG) paradigm actively decides when and what to retrieve during the text generation process of Large Language Models (LLMs). There are two key elements of this paradigm: identifyin…
RAGRetrievalRetrieval-augmented GenerationSentence+1The Value of Information When Deciding What to Learn
All sequential decision-making agents explore so as to acquire knowledge about a particular target. It is often the responsibility of the agent designer to construct this target which, in rich and complex environments, c…
Decision MakingSequential Decision MakingDeciding Morality of Graphs is NP-complete
In order to find a causal explanation for data presented in the form of covariance and concentration matrices it is necessary to decide if the graph formed by such associations is a projection of a directed acyclic graph…
EgoArgus: Benchmarking VLMs as Situational Assistants for Modality-Grounded User Supports
VLMs are increasingly positioned as daily assistants that perceive first-person environments, follow user dialogue, and decide how to help. Existing egocentric benchmarks mainly evaluate visual understanding in isolation…
Optimal Pre-Analysis Plans: Statistical Decisions Subject to Implementability
What is the purpose of pre-analysis plans, and how should they be designed? We model the interaction between an agent who analyzes data and a principal who makes a decision based on agent reports. The agent could be the …
valid