paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Unbiased evaluation of ranking metrics reveals consistent performance in science and technology citation data

2020-01-15 · Shuqi Xu, Manuel Sebastian Mariani, Linyuan Lü, Matúš Medo

Despite the increasing use of citation-based metrics for research evaluation purposes, we do not know yet which metrics best deliver on their promise to gauge the significance of a scientific paper or a patent. We assess 17 network-based metrics by their ability to identify milestone papers and patents in three large citation datasets. We find that traditional information-retrieval evaluation metrics are strongly affected by the interplay between the age distribution of the milestone items and age biases of the evaluated metrics. Outcomes of these metrics are therefore not representative of the metrics' ranking ability. We argue in favor of a modified evaluation procedure that explicitly penalizes biased metrics and allows us to reveal metrics' performance patterns that are consistent across the datasets. PageRank and LeaderRank turn out to be the best-performing ranking metrics when their age bias is suppressed by a simple transformation of the scores that they produce, whereas other popular metrics, including citation count, HITS and Collective Influence, produce significantly worse ranking results.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2001.05414

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Information RetrievalRetrieval

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

On (Normalised) Discounted Cumulative Gain as an Off-Policy Evaluation Metric for Top-$n$ Recommendation

2023-07-27 · Olivier Jeunen, Ivan Potapov, Aleksei Ustimenko

Approaches to recommendation are typically evaluated in one of two ways: (1) via a (simulated) online experiment, often seen as the gold standard, or (2) via some offline evaluation procedure, where the goal is to approx…

Information RetrievalOff-policy evaluation

Policy-Aware Unbiased Learning to Rank for Top-k Rankings

2020-05-18 · Harrie Oosterhuis, Maarten de Rijke

Counterfactual Learning to Rank (LTR) methods optimize ranking systems using logged user interactions that contain interaction biases. Existing methods are only unbiased if users are presented with all relevant items in …

counterfactualLearning-To-RankRetrieval

Rethinking the Evaluation of Unbiased Scene Graph Generation

2022-08-03 · Xingchen Li, Long Chen, Jian Shao, Shaoning Xiao 외

Current Scene Graph Generation (SGG) methods tend to predict frequent predicate categories and fail to recognize rare ones due to the severe imbalanced distribution of predicates. To improve the robustness of SGG models …

DiversityGraph GenerationScene Graph GenerationTriplet+1

Unbiased Comparative Evaluation of Ranking Functions

2016-04-25 · Tobias Schnabel, Adith Swaminathan, Peter Frazier, Thorsten Joachims

Eliciting relevance judgments for ranking evaluation is labor-intensive and costly, motivating careful selection of which documents to judge. Unlike traditional approaches that make this selection deterministically, prob…

Off-Policy Evaluation of Ranking Policies under Diverse User Behavior

2023-06-26 · Haruka Kiyohara, Masatoshi Uehara, Yusuke Narita, Nobuyuki Shimizu 외

Ranking interfaces are everywhere in online platforms. There is thus an ever growing interest in their Off-Policy Evaluation (OPE), aiming towards an accurate performance evaluation of ranking policies using logged data.…

Off-policy evaluation