Uncovering Hidden Correctness in LLM Causal Reasoning via Symbolic Verification
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly being applied to tasks that involve causal reasoning. However, current benchmarks often rely on string matching or surface-level metrics that do not capture whether the output of a model is formally valid under the semantics of causal reasoning. To address this, we propose DoVerifier, a simple symbolic verifier that checks whether LLM-generated causal expressions are derivable from a given causal graph using rules from do-calculus and probability theory. This allows us to recover correct answers to causal queries that would otherwise be marked incorrect due to superficial differences in their causal semantics. Our evaluations on synthetic data and causal QA benchmarks show that DoVerifier more accurately captures semantic correctness of causal reasoning traces, offering a more rigorous and informative way to evaluate LLMs on causal reasoning.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Can Large Language Models Adequately Perform Symbolic Reasoning Over Time Series?
Uncovering hidden symbolic laws from time series data, as an aspiration dating back to Kepler's discovery of planetary motion, remains a core challenge in scientific discovery and artificial intelligence. While Large Lan…
Reasoning in Computer Vision: Taxonomy, Models, Tasks, and Methodologies
Visual reasoning matters for many computer vision tasks that go beyond surface-level object detection and classification. Despite progress in relational, symbolic, temporal, causal, and commonsense reasoning, existing su…
Visual Question AnsweringAutonomous DrivingObject DetectionGraph GenerationCausalGame: Benchmarking Causal Thinking of LLM Agents in Games
Building AI Scientist agents with Large Language Models (LLMs) has recently attracted growing attention. Since scientific discovery fundamentally relies on uncovering causal relationships from observations, the capabilit…
Hidden Error Awareness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning: The Signal Is Diagnostic, Not Causal
Chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting assumes that generated reasoning reflects a model's internal computation. We show this assumption is wrong in a specific, measurable way: models internally detect their own reasoning erro…
Think before You Simulate: Symbolic Reasoning to Orchestrate Neural Computation for Counterfactual Question Answering
Causal and temporal reasoning about video dynamics is a challenging problem. While neuro-symbolic models that combine symbolic reasoning with neural-based perception and prediction have shown promise, they exhibit limita…
counterfactualCounterfactual ReasoningQuestion Answering