Understanding and Mitigating Classification Errors Through Interpretable Token Patterns
State-of-the-art NLP methods achieve human-like performance on many tasks, but make errors nevertheless. Characterizing these errors in easily interpretable terms gives insight into whether a classifier is prone to making systematic errors, but also gives a way to act and improve the classifier. We propose to discover those patterns of tokens that distinguish correct and erroneous predictions as to obtain global and interpretable descriptions for arbitrary NLP classifiers. We formulate the problem of finding a succinct and non-redundant set of such patterns in terms of the Minimum Description Length principle. Through an extensive set of experiments, we show that our method, Premise, performs well in practice. Unlike existing solutions, it recovers ground truth, even on highly imbalanced data over large vocabularies. In VQA and NER case studies, we confirm that it gives clear and actionable insight into the systematic errors made by NLP classifiers.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
ClassificationNERVisual Question Answering (VQA)Methods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
UniMo: Unified Motion Generation and Understanding with Chain of Thought
Existing 3D human motion generation and understanding methods often exhibit limited interpretability, restricting effective mutual enhancement between these inherently related tasks. While current unified frameworks base…
Reinforcement LearningDebugAgent: Efficient and Interpretable Error Slice Discovery for Comprehensive Model Debugging
Despite the significant success of deep learning models in computer vision, they often exhibit systematic failures on specific data subsets, known as error slices. Identifying and mitigating these error slices is crucial…
image-classificationImage Classificationobject-detectionObject Detection+2Characterizing Misclassifications of Deep NLP Models
Understanding the reasons for misclassification is a critical point to improve a black-box classifier's performance. We propose a method to characterize these classification errors while considering the challenges that N…
named-entity-recognitionNamed Entity RecognitionNamed Entity Recognition (NER)Question Answering+2Understanding and Mitigating Human-Labelling Errors in Supervised Contrastive Learning
Human-annotated vision datasets inevitably contain a fraction of human mislabelled examples. While the detrimental effects of such mislabelling on supervised learning are well-researched, their influence on Supervised Co…
Contrastive LearningRepresentation LearningSMOSE: Sparse Mixture of Shallow Experts for Interpretable Reinforcement Learning in Continuous Control Tasks
Continuous control tasks often involve high-dimensional, dynamic, and non-linear environments. State-of-the-art performance in these tasks is achieved through complex closed-box policies that are effective, but suffer fr…
continuous-controlContinuous ControlMixture-of-ExpertsMuJoCo