Understanding Image Quality and Trust in Peer-to-Peer Marketplaces
As any savvy online shopper knows, second-hand peer-to-peer marketplaces are filled with images of mixed quality. How does image quality impact marketplace outcomes, and can quality be automatically predicted? In this work, we conducted a large-scale study on the quality of user-generated images in peer-to-peer marketplaces. By gathering a dataset of common second-hand products (~75,000 images) and annotating a subset with human-labeled quality judgments, we were able to model and predict image quality with decent accuracy (~87%). We then conducted two studies focused on understanding the relationship between these image quality scores and two marketplace outcomes: sales and perceived trustworthiness. We show that image quality is associated with higher likelihood that an item will be sold, though other factors such as view count were better predictors of sales. Nonetheless, we show that high quality user-generated images selected by our models outperform stock imagery in eliciting perceptions of trust from users. Our findings can inform the design of future marketplaces and guide potential sellers to take better product images.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Epistemic Context Learning: Building Trust the Right Way in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems
Individual agents in multi-agent (MA) systems often lack robustness, tending to blindly conform to misleading peers. We show this weakness stems from both sycophancy and inadequate ability to evaluate peer reliability. T…
Reinforcement LearningLarge Language Models in Peer-Run Community Behavioral Health Services: Understanding Peer Specialists and Service Users' Perspectives on Opportunities, Risks, and Mitigation Strategies
Peer-run organizations (PROs) provide critical, recovery-based behavioral health support rooted in lived experience. As large language models (LLMs) enter this domain, their scale, conversationality, and opacity introduc…
PeerArg: Argumentative Peer Review with LLMs
Peer review is an essential process to determine the quality of papers submitted to scientific conferences or journals. However, it is subjective and prone to biases. Several studies have been conducted to apply techniqu…
Decision MakingFew-Shot LearningConsistency and Trust in Peer Data Exchange Systems
We propose and investigate a semantics for "peer data exchange systems" where different peers are related by data exchange constraints and trust relationships. These two elements plus the data at the peers' sites and the…
Active peer effects in residential photovoltaic adoption: evidence on impact drivers among potential and current adopters in Germany
While the importance of peer influences has been demonstrated in several studies, little is known about the underlying mechanisms of active peer effects in residential photovoltaic (PV) diffusion. Empirical evidence indi…
Decision Making