paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Unsupervised Visual Chain-of-Thought Reasoning via Preference Optimization

2025-04-25 · Kesen Zhao, Beier Zhu, Qianru Sun, Hanwang Zhang

Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning greatly improves the interpretability and problem-solving abilities of multimodal large language models (MLLMs). However, existing approaches are focused on text CoT, limiting their ability to leverage visual cues. Visual CoT remains underexplored, and the only work is based on supervised fine-tuning (SFT) that relies on extensive labeled bounding-box data and is hard to generalize to unseen cases. In this paper, we introduce Unsupervised Visual CoT (UV-CoT), a novel framework for image-level CoT reasoning via preference optimization. UV-CoT performs preference comparisons between model-generated bounding boxes (one is preferred and the other is dis-preferred), eliminating the need for bounding-box annotations. We get such preference data by introducing an automatic data generation pipeline. Given an image, our target MLLM (e.g., LLaVA-1.5-7B) generates seed bounding boxes using a template prompt and then answers the question using each bounded region as input. An evaluator MLLM (e.g., OmniLLM-12B) ranks the responses, and these rankings serve as supervision to train the target MLLM with UV-CoT by minimizing negative log-likelihood losses. By emulating human perception--identifying key regions and reasoning based on them--UV-CoT can improve visual comprehension, particularly in spatial reasoning tasks where textual descriptions alone fall short. Our experiments on six datasets demonstrate the superiority of UV-CoT, compared to the state-of-the-art textual and visual CoT methods. Our zero-shot testing on four unseen datasets shows the strong generalization of UV-CoT. The code is available in https://github.com/kesenzhao/UV-CoT.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2504.18397

Code (1)

kesenzhao/uv-cot 공식 구현 pytorch

Tasks

Spatial Reasoning

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

ClinCoT: Clinical-Aware Visual Chain-of-Thought for Medical Vision Language Models

2026-03-01 · Xiwei Liu, Yulong Li, Xinlin Zhuang, Xuhui Li 외 arxiv

Medical Vision-Language Models have shown promising potential in clinical decision support, yet they remain prone to factual hallucinations due to insufficient grounding in localized pathological evidence. Existing medic…

Multimodal Reasoning

OCEAN: Offline Chain-of-thought Evaluation and Alignment in Large Language Models

2024-10-31 · Junda Wu, Xintong Li, Ruoyu Wang, Yu Xia 외

Offline evaluation of LLMs is crucial in understanding their capacities, though current methods remain underexplored in existing research. In this work, we focus on the offline evaluation of the chain-of-thought capabili…

Entity LinkingKnowledge Graphs

Separate First, Fuse Later: Mitigating Cross-Modal Interference in Audio-Visual LLMs Reasoning with Modality-Specific Chain-of-Thought

2026-05-11 · Xuanchen Li, Yuheng Lu, Chenrui Cui, Tianrui Wang 외 arxiv

Audio and vision provide complementary evidence for audio-visual question answering, yet current audio-visual large language models may suffer from cross-modal interference: information from one modality misguides the in…

Audio-visual Question AnsweringReinforcement LearningVisual Reasoning

MCPO: Modality-Contrastive Preference Optimization for Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Compression

2026-09-04 · Guangheng Yang, Zhenliang Ni, Zhenkai Wu, Han Shu 외 arxiv

Recently, multimodal large-scale reasoning models have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in solving complex tasks through long Chains-of-Thought (M-CoT). However, excessively long reasoning trajectories incur substant…

Chain of Preference Optimization: Improving Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in LLMs

2024-06-13 · Xuan Zhang, Chao Du, Tianyu Pang, Qian Liu 외

The recent development of chain-of-thought (CoT) decoding has enabled large language models (LLMs) to generate explicit logical reasoning paths for complex problem-solving. However, research indicates that these paths ar…

Arithmetic ReasoningFact VerificationLogical ReasoningQuestion Answering