paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Unveiling Ontological Commitment in Multi-Modal Foundation Models

2024-09-25 · Mert Keser, Gesina Schwalbe, Niki Amini-Naieni, Matthias Rottmann, Alois Knoll

Ontological commitment, i.e., used concepts, relations, and assumptions, are a corner stone of qualitative reasoning (QR) models. The state-of-the-art for processing raw inputs, though, are deep neural networks (DNNs), nowadays often based off from multimodal foundation models. These automatically learn rich representations of concepts and respective reasoning. Unfortunately, the learned qualitative knowledge is opaque, preventing easy inspection, validation, or adaptation against available QR models. So far, it is possible to associate pre-defined concepts with latent representations of DNNs, but extractable relations are mostly limited to semantic similarity. As a next step towards QR for validation and verification of DNNs: Concretely, we propose a method that extracts the learned superclass hierarchy from a multimodal DNN for a given set of leaf concepts. Under the hood we (1) obtain leaf concept embeddings using the DNN's textual input modality; (2) apply hierarchical clustering to them, using that DNNs encode semantic similarities via vector distances; and (3) label the such-obtained parent concepts using search in available ontologies from QR. An initial evaluation study shows that meaningful ontological class hierarchies can be extracted from state-of-the-art foundation models. Furthermore, we demonstrate how to validate and verify a DNN's learned representations against given ontologies. Lastly, we discuss potential future applications in the context of QR.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2409.17109

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Semantic SimilaritySemantic Textual Similarity

Methods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론

SET Dynamic Sparse Training method where weight mask is updated randomly periodically
+ ( 1 ) ⟷ 888 ⟷ ( 829 ) ⟷ 0881||How do I resolve a dispute on Expedia? How do I resolve a dispute on Expedia contact their support at + ( 1 ) ⟷ 888 ⟷ ( 829 ) ⟷ 0881 or + ( 1 ) ⟷ 805 ⟷ ( 330 ) ⟷ 4056. Provide booking details and explain the issue…

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

From Hesitancy Framings to Vaccine Hesitancy Profiles: A Journey of Stance, Ontological Commitments and Moral Foundations

2022-02-18 · Maxwell Weinzierl, Sanda Harabagiu

While billions of COVID-19 vaccines have been administered, too many people remain hesitant. Twitter, with its substantial reach and daily exposure, is an excellent resource for examining how people frame their vaccine h…

The Mercurial Top-Level Ontology of Large Language Models

2024-04-26 · Nele Köhler, Fabian Neuhaus

In our work, we systematize and analyze implicit ontological commitments in the responses generated by large language models (LLMs), focusing on ChatGPT 3.5 as a case study. We investigate how LLMs, despite having no exp…

Know your exceptions: Towards an Ontology of Exceptions in Knowledge Representation

2024-03-01 · Gabriele Sacco, Loris Bozzato, Oliver Kutz

Defeasible reasoning is a kind of reasoning where some generalisations may not be valid in all circumstances, that is general conclusions may fail in some cases. Various formalisms have been developed to model this kind …

Common Sense Reasoningvalid

Scaling up the discovery of hesitancy profiles by identifying the framing of beliefs towards vaccine confidence in Twitter discourse

2023-04-01 · Journal of Behavioral Medicine 2023 4 · Maxwell A. Weinzierl, Suellen Hopfer, Sanda M. Harabagiu

Our study focused on the discovery of how vaccine hesitancy is framed in Twitter discourse, allowing us to recognize at-scale all tweets that evoke any of the hesitancy framings as well as the stance of the tweet authors…

Misinformation

Substrate Stability Under Persistent Disagreement: Structural Constraints for Neutral Ontological Substrates

2026-01-22 · Denise M. Case arxiv

Modern data systems increasingly operate under conditions of persistent legal, political, and analytic disagreement. In such settings, interoperability cannot rely on shared interpretation, negotiated semantics, or centr…