Using Complex Argumentative Interactions to Reconstruct the Argumentative Structure of Large-Scale Debates
In this paper we consider the insights that can be gained by considering large scale argument networks and the complex interactions between their constituent propositions. We investigate metrics for analysing properties of these networks, illustrating these using a corpus of arguments taken from the 2016 US Presidential Debates. We present techniques for determining these features directly from natural language text and show that there is a strong correlation between these automatically identified features and the argumentative structure contained within the text. Finally, we combine these metrics with argument mining techniques and show how the identification of argumentative relations can be improved by considering the larger context in which they occur.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Argument MiningDecision MakingSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
A School Student Essay Corpus for Analyzing Interactions of Argumentative Structure and Quality
Learning argumentative writing is challenging. Besides writing fundamentals such as syntax and grammar, learners must select and arrange argument components meaningfully to create high-quality essays. To support argument…
Argument MiningEnd-to-End Argument Mining through Autoregressive Argumentative Structure Prediction
Argument Mining (AM) helps in automating the extraction of complex argumentative structures such as Argument Components (ACs) like Premise, Claim etc. and Argumentative Relations (ARs) like Support, Attack etc. in an arg…
Argument MiningA Corpus of Deep Argumentative Structures as an Explanation to Argumentative Relations
In this paper, we compose a new task for deep argumentative structure analysis that goes beyond shallow discourse structure analysis. The idea is that argumentative relations can reasonably be represented with a small se…
Citation Recommendation based on Argumentative Zoning of User Queries
Citation recommendation aims to locate the important papers for scholars to cite. When writing the citing sentences, the authors usually hold different citing intents, which are referred to citation function in citation …
Citation RecommendationMulti-Task LearningSentenceArgumentative Segmentation Enhancement for Legal Summarization
We use the combination of argumentative zoning [1] and a legal argumentative scheme to create legal argumentative segments. Based on the argumentative segmentation, we propose a novel task of classifying argumentative se…
Segmentation