Utility-Based Communication Requirements for Stable Matching in Large Markets
Results from the communication complexity literature have demonstrated that stable matching requires communication: one cannot find or verify a stable match without having access to essentially all of the ordinal preference information held privately by the agents in the market. Stated differently, these results show that stable matching mechanisms are not robust to even a small number of labeled inaccuracies in the input preferences. In practice, these results indicate that agents must go through the time-intensive process of accurately ranking each and every potential match candidate if they wish for the resulting match to be guaranteedly stable. Thus, in large markets, communication requirements for stable matching may be impractically high. A natural question to ask, given this result, is whether some higher-order structure in the market can indicate which large markets have steeper communication requirements. In this paper, we perform such an analysis in a regime where agents have a utility-based notion of preference. We consider a dynamic model where agents only have access to an approximation of their utility that satisfies a universal multiplicative error bound. We apply guarantees from the theoretical computer science literature on low-distortion embeddings of finite metric spaces to understand the communication requirements of stable matching in large markets in terms of their structural properties. Our results show that for a broad family of markets, the error bound may not grow faster than $n^2\log(n)$ while maintaining a deterministic guarantee on the behavior of stable matching mechanisms in the limit. We also show that a stronger probabilistic guarantee may be made so long as the bound grows at most logarithmically in the underlying topological complexity of the market.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Stable Matching with Ties: Approximation Ratios and Learning
We study the problem of matching markets with ties, where one side of the market does not necessarily have strict preferences over members at its other side. For example, workers do not always have strict preferences ove…
Yogurts Choose Consumers? Estimation of Random-Utility Models via Two-Sided Matching
The problem of demand inversion - a crucial step in the estimation of random utility discrete-choice models - is equivalent to the determination of stable outcomes in two-sided matching models. This equivalence applies t…
Discrete Choice ModelsStable and extremely unequal
We highlight the tension between stability and equality in non transferable utility matching. We consider many to one matchings and refer to the two sides of the market as students and schools. The latter have aligned pr…
Parallel and Mini-Batch Stable Matching for Large-Scale Reciprocal Recommender Systems
Reciprocal recommender systems (RRSs) are crucial in online two-sided matching platforms, such as online job or dating markets, as they need to consider the preferences of both sides of the match. The concentration of re…
Recommendation SystemsThe matching problem with linear transfers is equivalent to a hide-and-seek game
Matching problems with linearly transferable utility (LTU) generalize the well-studied transferable utility (TU) case by relaxing the assumption that utility is transferred one-for-one within matched pairs. We show that …