Verified Misguidance: Measuring Structural Citation Failures in Search-Augmented LLMs
Users of search-augmented LLMs rely on citations as evidence that responses are grounded in real sources, and rarely verify the cited pages themselves. Millions of queries per day now pass through these systems, making citation quality a silent determinant of whether users are informed or misled-yet existing benchmarks each address one facet in isolation, leaving the joint structure that determines citation trustworthiness unmeasured. We construct CITETRACE, a large-scale dataset that traces the full citation chain from user query through retrieved source to generated answer: 11,200 real-world queries from 28 communities paired with 112,000 responses from ten models across five providers, yielding 761,495 evaluable citation pairs. We design a three-dimension evaluation framework that scores each citation on intent-purpose alignment, source suitability, and answer-source fidelity, using expert-validated predefined matrices and a five-level fidelity rubric; the framework applies to any system that produces citation-bearing responses. Applying this framework at scale, we identify a systematic pattern we call VERIFIED MISGUIDANCE (VM): models cite real, accessible sources yet fail along one or more dimensions, producing a fidelity-suitability trade-off in which faithful models select inappropriate sources and vice versa. Across our pool, 30.6% of citations distort their sources and 27.1% originate from domain-inappropriate sources; at the response level, up to 96% of users encounter at least one structurally misleading citation. Provider-level differences explain 88-96% of citation-quality variance, suggesting that source selection is governed more by factors beyond individual model capability than by the LLMs themselves. Together, CITETRACE and its evaluation framework provide the first resource for diagnosing structural citation failures in deployed search-augmented systems.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Citation Structural Diversity: A Novel and Concise Metric Combining Structure and Semantics for Literature Evaluation
As academic research becomes increasingly diverse, traditional literature evaluation methods face significant limitations,particularly in capturing the complexity of academic dissemination and the multidimensional impact…
DiversityHierarchical Memorization in Large Language Models: Evidence from Citation Generation
Large language models (LLMs) generate fluent text across a wide range of tasks, but the fabrication of non-existent academic citations remains a critical and well-documented failure mode. Building on prior work that fram…
Subsurface defect imaging in PZT ceramics using dual point contact excitation and detection
The application of piezoelectric materials, such as Lead Zirconate Titanate (ZrxTi1-x) O3 (PZT) is increasing in multiple dynamic industries such as structural health monitoring, wireless energy harvesting devices, measu…
DenoisingStructural Health MonitoringTopic-adjusted visibility metric for scientific articles
Measuring the impact of scientific articles is important for evaluating the research output of individual scientists, academic institutions and journals. While citations are raw data for constructing impact measures, the…
ArticlesTiled Prompts: Overcoming Prompt Misguidance in Image and Video Super-Resolution
Text-conditioned diffusion models have advanced image and video super-resolution by using prompts as semantic priors, and modern super-resolution pipelines typically rely on latent tiling to scale to high resolutions. In…
Video Super-Resolution