paper-with-me

Papers

Verify Before You Fix: Agentic Execution Grounding for Trustworthy Cross-Language Code Analysis

2026-04-12 · Jugal Gajjar arxiv

Learned classifiers deployed in agentic pipelines face a fundamental reliability problem: predictions are probabilistic inferences, not verified conclusions, and acting on them without grounding in observable evidence leads to compounding failures across downstream stages. Software vulnerability analysis makes this cost concrete and measurable. We address this through a unified cross-language vulnerability lifecycle framework built around three LLM-driven reasoning stages-hybrid structural-semantic detection, execution-grounded agentic validation, and validation-aware iterative repair-governed by a strict invariant: no repair action is taken without execution-based confirmation of exploitability. Cross-language generalization is achieved via a Universal Abstract Syntax Tree (uAST) normalizing Java, Python, and C++ into a shared structural schema, combined with a hybrid fusion of GraphSAGE and Qwen2.5-Coder-1.5B embeddings through learned two-way gating, whose per-sample weights provide intrinsic explainability at no additional cost. The framework achieves 89.84-92.02% intra-language detection accuracy and 74.43-80.12% zero-shot cross-language F1, resolving 69.74% of vulnerabilities end-to-end at a 12.27% total failure rate. Ablations establish necessity: removing uAST degrades cross-language F1 by 23.42%, while disabling validation increases unnecessary repairs by 131.7%. These results demonstrate that execution-grounded closed-loop reasoning is a principled and practically deployable mechanism for trustworthy LLM-driven agentic AI.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2604.10800

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

TessPay: Verify-then-Pay Infrastructure for Trusted Agentic Commerce

2026-01-30 · Mehul Goenka, Tejas Pathak, Siddharth Asthana arxiv

The global economy is entering the era of Agentic Commerce, where autonomous agents can discover services, negotiate prices, and transact value. However adoption towards agentic commerce faces a foundational trust gap: c…

Real-Time Trust Verification for Safe Agentic Actions using TrustBench

2026-03-10 · Tavishi Sharma, Vinayak Sharma, Pragya Sharma arxiv

As large language models evolve from conversational assistants to autonomous agents, ensuring trustworthiness requires a fundamental shift from post-hoc evaluation to real-time action verification. Current frameworks lik…

Agentic Jackal: Live Execution and Semantic Value Grounding for Text-to-JQL

2026-04-10 · Vishnu Murali, Anmol Gulati, Elias Lumer, Kevin Frank 외 arxiv

Translating natural language into Jira Query Language (JQL) requires resolving ambiguous field references, instance-specific categorical values, and complex Boolean predicates. Single-pass LLMs cannot discover which cate…

Semantic Retrieval

Agentic Uncertainty Reveals Agentic Overconfidence

2026-02-06 · Jean Kaddour, Srijan Patel, Gbètondji Dovonon, Leo Richter 외 arxiv

Can AI agents predict whether they will succeed at a task? We study agentic uncertainty by eliciting success probability estimates before, during, and after task execution. All results exhibit agentic overconfidence: som…

MTSQL-R1: Towards Long-Horizon Multi-Turn Text-to-SQL via Agentic Training

2025-10-12 · Taicheng Guo, Hai Wang, ChaoChun Liu, Mohsen Golalikhani 외 arxiv

Multi-turn Text-to-SQL aims to translate a user's conversational utterances into executable SQL while preserving dialogue coherence and grounding to the target schema. However, most existing systems only regard this task…

Semantic Parsing