VET: A Framework for Analyzing AI Discourse
Public discourse on AI has become polarized; exaggerated positions on AI in traditional and social media threaten the development of AI Literacy among the general public. In this article, I introduce the VET Framework, a method for categorizing AI discourse along the dimensions of valence, effectiveness, and trajectory. I show how this framework can be used to identify, compare, and critique prevalent narratives of AI Hype, AI Doom, AI Denial, and AI Normalcy. Using VET, I analyze how each of these four stances exaggerates some aspects of the current state and/or likely evolution of AI, and illustrate how the VET framework can serve as an AI Literacy tool by supporting the ``vetting'' of polarized AI discourse.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Bias in Semantic and Discourse Interpretation
In this paper, we show how game-theoretic work on conversation combined with a theory of discourse structure provides a framework for studying interpretive bias. Interpretive bias is an essential feature of learning and …
Predicting Political Orientation in News with Latent Discourse Structure to Improve Bias Understanding
With the growing number of information sources, the problem of media bias becomes worrying for a democratic society. This paper explores the task of predicting the political orientation of news articles, with a goal of a…
ArticlesIdentifying Stance by Analyzing Political Discourse on Twitter
Analyzing Argumentative Discourse Units in Online Interactions
Align to Structure: Aligning Large Language Models with Structural Information
Generating long, coherent text remains a challenge for large language models (LLMs), as they lack hierarchical planning and structured organization in discourse generation. We introduce Structural Alignment, a novel meth…
Document SummarizationText Generation