Video Quality Assessment and Coding Complexity of the Versatile Video Coding Standard
In recent years, the proliferation of multimedia applications and formats, such as IPTV, Virtual Reality (VR, 360-degree), and point cloud videos, has presented new challenges to the video compression research community. Simultaneously, there has been a growing demand from users for higher resolutions and improved visual quality. To further enhance coding efficiency, a new video coding standard, Versatile Video Coding (VVC), was introduced in July 2020. This paper conducts a comprehensive analysis of coding performance and complexity for the latest VVC standard in comparison to its predecessor, High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC). The study employs a diverse set of test sequences, covering both High Definition (HD) and Ultra High Definition (UHD) resolutions, and spans a wide range of bit-rates. These sequences are encoded using the reference software encoders of HEVC (HM) and VVC (VTM). The results consistently demonstrate that VVC outperforms HEVC, achieving bit-rate savings of up to 40% on the subjective quality scale, particularly at realistic bit-rates and quality levels. Objective quality metrics, including PSNR, SSIM, and VMAF, support these findings, revealing bit-rate savings ranging from 31% to 40%, depending on the video content, spatial resolution, and the selected quality metric. However, these improvements in coding efficiency come at the cost of significantly increased computational complexity. On average, our results indicate that the VVC decoding process is 1.5 times more complex, while the encoding process becomes at least eight times more complex than that of the HEVC reference encoder. Our simultaneous profiling of the two standards sheds light on the primary evolutionary differences between them and highlights the specific stages responsible for the observed increase in complexity.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
SSIMVideo CompressionVideo Quality AssessmentMethods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Subjective evaluation of UHD video coded using VVC with LCEVC and ML-VVC
This paper presents the results of a subjective quality assessment of a multilayer video coding configuration in which Low Complexity Enhancement Video Coding (LCEVC) is applied as an enhancement layer on top of a Versat…
IQNet: Image Quality Assessment Guided Just Noticeable Difference Prefiltering For Versatile Video Coding
Image prefiltering with just noticeable distortion (JND) improves coding efficiency in a visual lossless way by filtering the perceptually redundant information prior to compression. However, real JND cannot be well mode…
Image Quality AssessmentQuantizationIntra Encoding Complexity Control with a Time-Cost Model for Versatile Video Coding
For the latest video coding standard Versatile Video Coding (VVC), the encoding complexity is much higher than previous video coding standards to achieve a better coding efficiency, especially for intra coding. The compl…
Decoding Complexity-Rate-Quality Pareto-Front for Adaptive VVC Streaming
Pareto-front optimization is crucial for addressing the multi-objective challenges in video streaming, enabling the identification of optimal trade-offs between conflicting goals such as bitrate, video quality, and decod…
Multi-Objective Pareto-Front Optimization for Efficient Adaptive VVC Streaming
Adaptive video streaming has facilitated improved video streaming over the past years. A balance among coding performance objectives such as bitrate, video quality, and decoding complexity is required to achieve efficien…