VisFIS: Visual Feature Importance Supervision with Right-for-the-Right-Reason Objectives
Many past works aim to improve visual reasoning in models by supervising feature importance (estimated by model explanation techniques) with human annotations such as highlights of important image regions. However, recent work has shown that performance gains from feature importance (FI) supervision for Visual Question Answering (VQA) tasks persist even with random supervision, suggesting that these methods do not meaningfully align model FI with human FI. In this paper, we show that model FI supervision can meaningfully improve VQA model accuracy as well as performance on several Right-for-the-Right-Reason (RRR) metrics by optimizing for four key model objectives: (1) accurate predictions given limited but sufficient information (Sufficiency); (2) max-entropy predictions given no important information (Uncertainty); (3) invariance of predictions to changes in unimportant features (Invariance); and (4) alignment between model FI explanations and human FI explanations (Plausibility). Our best performing method, Visual Feature Importance Supervision (VisFIS), outperforms strong baselines on benchmark VQA datasets in terms of both in-distribution and out-of-distribution accuracy. While past work suggests that the mechanism for improved accuracy is through improved explanation plausibility, we show that this relationship depends crucially on explanation faithfulness (whether explanations truly represent the model's internal reasoning). Predictions are more accurate when explanations are plausible and faithful, and not when they are plausible but not faithful. Lastly, we show that, surprisingly, RRR metrics are not predictive of out-of-distribution model accuracy when controlling for a model's in-distribution accuracy, which calls into question the value of these metrics for evaluating model reasoning. All supporting code is available at https://github.com/zfying/visfis
Code (1)
Tasks
Feature ImportanceQuestion AnsweringVisual Question AnsweringVisual Question Answering (VQA)Visual ReasoningMethods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
From Illusion to Intention: Visual Rationale Learning for Vision-Language Reasoning
Recent advances in vision-language reasoning underscore the importance of thinking with images, where models actively ground their reasoning in visual evidence. Yet, prevailing frameworks treat visual actions as optional…
Attributes-aware Visual Emotion Representation Learning
Visual emotion analysis or recognition has gained considerable attention due to the growing interest in understanding how images can convey rich semantics and evoke emotions in human perception. However, visual emotion a…
AttributeEmotion RecognitionRepresentation LearningScene UnderstandingJoint Correcting and Refinement for Balanced Low-Light Image Enhancement
Low-light image enhancement tasks demand an appropriate balance among brightness, color, and illumination. While existing methods often focus on one aspect of the image without considering how to pay attention to this ba…
Image EnhancementLow-Light Image EnhancementSaliency DetectionVisual Watermarking in the Era of Diffusion Models: Advances and Challenges
As generative artificial intelligence technologies like Stable Diffusion advance, visual content becomes more vulnerable to misuse, raising concerns about copyright infringement. Visual watermarks serve as effective prot…
DeepFake DetectionFace SwappingSelf-Supervised Representation Learning for Visual Anomaly Detection
Self-supervised learning allows for better utilization of unlabelled data. The feature representation obtained by self-supervision can be used in downstream tasks such as classification, object detection, segmentation, a…
Anomaly DetectionGeneral Classificationobject-detectionObject Detection+4