WearBCI Dataset: Understanding and Benchmarking Real-World Wearable Brain-Computer Interfaces Signals
Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) have opened new platforms for human-computer interaction, medical diagnostics, and neurorehabilitation. Wearable BCI systems, which typically employ non-invasive electrodes for portable monitoring, hold great promise for real-world applications, but also face significant challenges of signal quality degradation caused by motion artifacts and environmental interferences. Most existing wearable BCI datasets are collected under stationary or controlled lab settings, limiting their utility for evaluating performance under body movement. To bridge this gap, we introduce WearBCI, the first dataset that comprehensively evaluates wearable BCI signals under different motion dynamics with synchronized multimodal recordings (EEG, IMU, and egocentric video), and systematic benchmark evaluations for studying impacts of motion artifact. Specifically, we collect data from 36 participants across different motion dynamics, including body movements, walking, and navigation. This dataset includes synchronized electroencephalography (EEG), inertial measurement unit (IMU) data, and egocentric video recordings. We analyze the collected wearable EEG signals to understand the impact of motion artifacts across different conditions, and benchmark representative EEG signal enhancement techniques on our dataset. Furthermore, we explore two new case studies: cross-modal EEG signal enhancement and multi-dimension human behavior understanding. These findings offer valuable insights into real-world wearable BCI deployment and new applications.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Benchmarking that Matters: Rethinking Benchmarking for Practical Impact
Benchmarking has driven scientific progress in Evolutionary Computation, yet current practices fall short of real-world needs. Widely used synthetic suites such as BBOB and CEC isolate algorithmic phenomena but poorly re…
What's Different between Visual Question Answering for Machine "Understanding" Versus for Accessibility?
In visual question answering (VQA), a machine must answer a question given an associated image. Recently, accessibility researchers have explored whether VQA can be deployed in a real-world setting where users with visua…
BenchmarkingQuestion AnsweringVisual Question AnsweringVisual Question Answering (VQA)The Adversarial AI-Art: Understanding, Generation, Detection, and Benchmarking
Generative AI models can produce high-quality images based on text prompts. The generated images often appear indistinguishable from images generated by conventional optical photography devices or created by human artist…
BenchmarkingMisinformationDependEval: Benchmarking LLMs for Repository Dependency Understanding
While large language models (LLMs) have shown considerable promise in code generation, real-world software development demands advanced repository-level reasoning. This includes understanding dependencies, project struct…
BenchmarkingCode GenerationTDBench: Benchmarking Vision-Language Models in Understanding Top-Down Images
The rapid emergence of Vision-Language Models (VLMs) has significantly advanced multimodal understanding, enabling applications in scene comprehension and visual reasoning. While these models have been primarily evaluate…
Autonomous NavigationBenchmarkingVisual Reasoning